09-06-2022, 12:14 AM
09-06-2022, 03:33 AM
(09-06-2022 12:14 AM)jimmythesaint Wrote: [ -> ]criminal
https://rumble.com/v1f074n-father-whose-...e-omi.html
very sad.. but not my problem..
I get this father's frustration but yelling at a low level employee of a pharmacy isn't going to change anything.....I hope he channels his anger into organizing other parents and people that have had bad side effects due to the "vaccines" and boosters into a national/international movement to hold those actually responsible for this crime against humanity....i.e. Dr. Death Fauci, Big Pharma Exec's, UN and US politicians that pushed these harmful experimental drugs and curtailed the use of cheap, effective drugs like Ivermectin and others.
As more and more people die from these experimental drugs and more and more families are affected, I hope a mass popular movement arises to get to the truth of what really happened....i.e. who funded illegal gain of function research in China, how the virus escaped containment, how effective drugs were purposely taken off the market and refused to doctor's to prescribe to patients, how data and statistic's were manipulated (giving money to hospitals for each covid "death", lying about ivermectin statistic's in India and Mexico, etc.), how drug companies and FDA lied to keep statistic's and ingredients secret from scientists and public for up to 75 years (since struck down by US Courts), suppression of side effects statistic's, suppression of common sense risk statistic's for certain groups with less than .01% of death from Covid, etc...
We will look back on this time in history as a travesty of justice and one of the largest crimes against humanity by the people that are supposedly looking out for the populace....NOT!
09-06-2022, 10:55 PM
New ivermectin study out of Brazil shows 92% lower chance of COVID death !!!
Ivermectin Study Shows 92% Lower Chance of Covid Death!
Peer Reviewed Article:
Article: Regular use of Ivermectin as Prophylaxis for Covid-19 led up to a 92% Reduction in Covid-19 Mortality Rate in a dose response manner: Results of a prospective observational study of a strictly controlled population of 88,012 subjects in Brazil - Published: August 31, 2022
This is just the first study verifying that Ivermectin actually DOES work at saving lives if used correctly (in proper doses) against Covid-19. More studies should be done and if this is conclusively verified will there then be court trials for crimes against humanity for the millions of lives that could have been easily saved with Ivermectin, except for those politicians, doctor's, administrator's, scientists and all the other's that kept this effective, safe and cheap drug out of patients use and also threatened doctor's with loss of medical license if they prescribed it to their dying patients?????????
Where is the OUTRAGE?
Where is the Media condemnation?
Where are the doctor's/scientists voicing their outrage against the authorities?
Where are the DOJ, FBI, FDA, CDC, WHO, UN ???????
Why isn't this front page news?
Why aren't more studies like this being funded by Gov'ts and NOT big pharma that can control the outcomes?
Where are the courts? (crimes against humanity, medical crimes, payoffs from big pharma to doctor's/politicians/scientists/hospitals, falsifying/manipulation of data, etc., breaking of the NUREMBERG CODE (DIRECTIVES FOR HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION[see below]), etc.)?????
Where and When will all the millions of people through-out the world who died and were incapacitated/harmed from the experimental/untested "vaccines/boosters" of this MAN-MADE, illegal gain of function, purposely made in a laboratory, China virus going to get justice?????
PS - Just for the record I am NOT suicidal, haven't been in a car accident in decades and LOVE Hillary Clinton (US people will get that joke).
I'll also post this here for those that want to read it....and determine for themselves if what our "leaders" did to us during the last two years was in violation of the below listed code (you also can google the more current Declaration of Helsinki):
NUREMBERG CODE (DIRECTIVES FOR HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION)
The Nuremberg Military Tribunal’s decision in the case of the United States v Karl Brandt et al. includes what is now called the Nuremberg Code, a ten point statement delimiting permissible medical experimentation on human subjects. According to this statement, humane experimentation is justified only if its results benefit society and it is carried out in accord with basic principles that “satisfy moral, ethical, and legal concepts.” To some extent the Nuremberg Code has been superseded by the Declaration of Helsinki as a guide for human experimentation.
–“Permissible Medical Experiments.” Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10. Nuremberg October 1946 – April 1949, Washington. U.S. Government Printing Office (n.d.), vol. 2., pp. 181-182.
1 - The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion, and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
2 - The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3 - The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
4 - The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5 - No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
6 - The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7 - Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury disability or death.
8 - The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9 - During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
10 - During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required by him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
Ivermectin Study Shows 92% Lower Chance of Covid Death!
Peer Reviewed Article:
Article: Regular use of Ivermectin as Prophylaxis for Covid-19 led up to a 92% Reduction in Covid-19 Mortality Rate in a dose response manner: Results of a prospective observational study of a strictly controlled population of 88,012 subjects in Brazil - Published: August 31, 2022
This is just the first study verifying that Ivermectin actually DOES work at saving lives if used correctly (in proper doses) against Covid-19. More studies should be done and if this is conclusively verified will there then be court trials for crimes against humanity for the millions of lives that could have been easily saved with Ivermectin, except for those politicians, doctor's, administrator's, scientists and all the other's that kept this effective, safe and cheap drug out of patients use and also threatened doctor's with loss of medical license if they prescribed it to their dying patients?????????
Where is the OUTRAGE?
Where is the Media condemnation?
Where are the doctor's/scientists voicing their outrage against the authorities?
Where are the DOJ, FBI, FDA, CDC, WHO, UN ???????
Why isn't this front page news?
Why aren't more studies like this being funded by Gov'ts and NOT big pharma that can control the outcomes?
Where are the courts? (crimes against humanity, medical crimes, payoffs from big pharma to doctor's/politicians/scientists/hospitals, falsifying/manipulation of data, etc., breaking of the NUREMBERG CODE (DIRECTIVES FOR HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION[see below]), etc.)?????
Where and When will all the millions of people through-out the world who died and were incapacitated/harmed from the experimental/untested "vaccines/boosters" of this MAN-MADE, illegal gain of function, purposely made in a laboratory, China virus going to get justice?????
PS - Just for the record I am NOT suicidal, haven't been in a car accident in decades and LOVE Hillary Clinton (US people will get that joke).
I'll also post this here for those that want to read it....and determine for themselves if what our "leaders" did to us during the last two years was in violation of the below listed code (you also can google the more current Declaration of Helsinki):
NUREMBERG CODE (DIRECTIVES FOR HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION)
The Nuremberg Military Tribunal’s decision in the case of the United States v Karl Brandt et al. includes what is now called the Nuremberg Code, a ten point statement delimiting permissible medical experimentation on human subjects. According to this statement, humane experimentation is justified only if its results benefit society and it is carried out in accord with basic principles that “satisfy moral, ethical, and legal concepts.” To some extent the Nuremberg Code has been superseded by the Declaration of Helsinki as a guide for human experimentation.
–“Permissible Medical Experiments.” Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10. Nuremberg October 1946 – April 1949, Washington. U.S. Government Printing Office (n.d.), vol. 2., pp. 181-182.
1 - The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion, and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
2 - The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
3 - The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.
4 - The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5 - No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
6 - The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
7 - Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury disability or death.
8 - The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9 - During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
10 - During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required by him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
09-07-2022, 10:03 PM
Another website that lists Ivermectin statistic's showing effective and favorable results from actual usage in countries around the world...
Ivermectin Studies Showing Favorable Results against Covid
Ivermectin Studies Showing Favorable Results against Covid
09-08-2022, 11:59 PM
SEE httpsXXcovid19criticalcare.com/XX remove x's.
This saved my life TWICE.
This saved my life TWICE.
09-09-2022, 04:07 AM
Thanks for the info GMAN100, sent you +5 Reps!
Also, here is the website with a clickable link...
FLCCC - Front Line China Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance Website
PS - Glad to hear you are okay!
Also, here is the website with a clickable link...
FLCCC - Front Line China Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance Website
PS - Glad to hear you are okay!
09-09-2022, 04:19 AM
This new research may bring joy to some people who do not want to get vaccinated.
Code:
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.abi611009-09-2022, 05:42 PM
(09-07-2022 10:03 PM)mthomas Wrote: [ -> ]Another website that lists Ivermectin statistic's showing effective and favorable results from actual usage in countries around the world...
Ivermectin Studies Showing Favorable Results against Covid
What's really sad is that some really low level meds, like aspirine taken from day one of infection, may have had reduced up to 90% hospitalizations.
new study from Lancet, but what-s most sad is the fact that here where I live "not in line with the protocol doctors" gave anti inflammatory meds to their patients and saved hundred in their own, but here they were jailed, stripped of their licenses. Meanwhile the authorities left the criminal docs in charge.
09-09-2022, 09:05 PM
(09-09-2022 05:42 PM)hey011 Wrote: [ -> ](09-07-2022 10:03 PM)mthomas Wrote: [ -> ]Another website that lists Ivermectin statistic's showing effective and favorable results from actual usage in countries around the world...
Ivermectin Studies Showing Favorable Results against Covid
What's really sad is that some really low level meds, like aspirine taken from day one of infection, may have had reduced up to 90% hospitalizations.
new study from Lancet, but what-s most sad is the fact that here where I live "not in line with the protocol doctors" gave anti inflammatory meds to their patients and saved hundred in their own, but here they were jailed, stripped of their licenses. Meanwhile the authorities left the criminal docs in charge.
Exactly!
When doctor's took an Oath to do no harm and then the majority of them look the other way when administrator's, politicians and big pharma bullies them into making decisions that they KNOW will harm and/or even kill (MURDER) their patients.
There were cheap, effective and easy methods (see the posts and websites listed in prior posts for additional info) to help save patients from China Covid that were blocked, lied about, falsely propagandized to say they didn't work and research that was either purposely unfunded or manipulated to show false results.
There were countries like India and Mexico that had great success using Ivermectin and other drugs which is slowly trickling out and of course the great die off of health young people dying left and right in the prime of their lives at the unprecedented rate of 40% mortality increases (as reported by Life Insurance company auctuaries).
One day in the future, the truth will come out as to the magnitude of the lies, deception, manipulation, propaganda, greed, and crimes against humanity that were perpetrated by all of these doctor's, scientists, politicians, Dr. Death Fauci, Gov's/hospital administrators, big pharm exec's, law enforcement, school unions, big companies, etc., forcing their employees (or lose their jobs) to get the death shot/boosters against their rights/will/freedoms, etc.....hopefully, BEFORE the MILLIONS of people that are going to die as a direct result of these experimental, illegal, untested and dangerous China Covid "vaccination" shots/boosters....(and let's not forget that Dr. Death Fauci had funded the illegal gain of function research of China Covid that created this entire fiasco and global unnecessary murder in the first place.
09-13-2022, 04:12 AM
For those here that were too young to remember this bit of media/scientist/politician/professor pushed propaganda....
Remember this the next time someone says, "Follow the science" and saying it's fact.....or trying to quiet those with a differing opinion towards the "established science" and labeling it as "misinformation"....sound familiar?
![[Image: Global-ice-age-BS.png]](https://i.ibb.co/s6NX7r2/Global-ice-age-BS.png)
.
Remember this the next time someone says, "Follow the science" and saying it's fact.....or trying to quiet those with a differing opinion towards the "established science" and labeling it as "misinformation"....sound familiar?
.