Best Blackhat Forum

Hey Darkweb,
Glad to hear your family has come through this in one piece.

Although you didn't ask, here is some unasked-for advice (take it or leave it)....
If you want to get in shape and lose weight quick and easy...(well this is relative)
Try walking each day and trying a Keto diet (I do this but cheat at times and am not too strict with it once my weight was where I wanted it...less than 50 grams/day rather than the more intense <20 grams/day net carbs).
You will have to cut out the sugar (to do the low carb thing) which might be the toughest part.

PS - If you (or anyone else for that matter) want any more suggestions to lose weight (I lost 30 lbs in 2 months using this diet/walking), let me know. If you don't want to hear more and like smoking, drinking, sugar, etc...than more power to you as well....to each his own. Just trying to help (if you want it). Cheers!

Uh oh.......countries with HIGHER "vaccination" rates ALSO have HIGHER death rates!!!

Opps, another Biden/CDC/Dr. Death Fauci LIE!





Seems he didn't get that right...China Virus, Covid Joe:

(07-23-2022 12:33 AM)mthomas Wrote: [ -> ]Uh oh.......countries with HIGHER "vaccination" rates ALSO have HIGHER death rates!!!

Uh oh..... countries with LOWER death rates are countries with LOWER realibility in official numbers - just like I said before.
You can interpret the numbers the way you want.
I don't know in which world you're living, but I'm on a real planet.
If you think that all these countries have reliable numbers about covid troubles, you do have a serious misunderstanding of the real situation.
I'm seeing numbers about countries that are rarely in the news. Niger, Nigeria, etc...
Let us talk about Human Development Index (HDI) and covid cases reported...
Brazil is #84 HDI
Niger #189 HDI
Nigeria #161
Burkina Farso #183 HDI
Cote d'Ivoire #162
Togo #167
Guinea #178
...
Egypt (#117) is approaching a better number, BUT where are the numbers?
Welcome to the reality:
"Covid-19: Egypt among top five countries underreporting coronavirus deaths
Reported Covid-19 deaths in Egypt are significantly lower than the actual figures, says World Bank report"
https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/covid...-countries
In Egypt, excess deaths were roughly 12 times as great as the official Covid toll.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/05/healt...eaths.html
In Mexico, the excess death toll during the first two years of the pandemic was twice as high as the government’s official tally of Covid deaths, the W.H.O. found.
In Pakistan, the figure was eight times as high.

(07-23-2022 01:00 AM)Vivekananda Wrote: [ -> ]

(07-23-2022 12:33 AM)mthomas Wrote: [ -> ]Uh oh.......countries with HIGHER "vaccination" rates ALSO have HIGHER death rates!!!

Uh oh..... countries with LOWER death rates are countries with LOWER realibility in official numbers - just like I said before.
You can interpret the numbers the way you want.
I don't know in which world you're living, but I'm on a real planet.
If you think that all these countries have reliable numbers about covid troubles, you do have a serious misunderstanding of the real situation.
I'm seeing numbers about countries that are rarely in the news. Niger, Nigeria, etc...
Let us talk about Human Development Index (HDI) and covid cases reported...
Brazil is #84 HDI
Niger #189 HDI
Nigeria #161
Burkina Farso #183 HDI
Cote d'Ivoire #162
Togo #167
Guinea #178
...
Egypt (#117) is approaching a better number, BUT where are the numbers?
Welcome to the reality:
"Covid-19: Egypt among top five countries underreporting coronavirus deaths
Reported Covid-19 deaths in Egypt are significantly lower than the actual figures, says World Bank report"
https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/covid...-countries
In Egypt, excess deaths were roughly 12 times as great as the official Covid toll.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/05/healt...eaths.html
In Mexico, the excess death toll during the first two years of the pandemic was twice as high as the government’s official tally of Covid deaths, the W.H.O. found.
In Pakistan, the figure was eight times as high.

Here is a past post since I guess you didn't read it through thoroughly the first time to fully comprehend the information:
I'm sure you're aware that a single family example has zero scientific relevance for statistical analysis.

Right so a Judge is asking for Pfizer to prove the effectiveness and safety of it's "vaccine" before giving it to children under 5 years old and they choose to attack the Judge as being "impartial"?????? Funny, how no one has any problem of impartiality when it came to Dr. Death Fauci profiting and making money from the "Vaccinations", restricting doctor's from prescribing Ivermectin and other drugs to fight Covid and he also directly funded the Chinese lab that created Covid by doing illegal (in the USA) gain of function bio experimentation on the viruses....gee, no impartiality there!

NOT a hoax, here is an actual creditable website (Bloomberg Law) with the TRUE story:
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/health-law...ata-pronto

So no transparency from the FDA or Pfizer on a new experimental drug given to approx. half the world population and you have no problem with that? Didn't have to give info for 55 to 75 years, yeah, that makes perfect sense....(yes, sarcasm again)
Seems the Uruguayan Judge may have been smarter than their so called Ministry of Public Health after all.

With regard to the 40% increase in NON Covid related deaths compared to pre-pandemic rates, this is UNHEARD of in the entire history of Life Insurance Industry. While I'm not saying it's ALL because of the vaccines, as right now NO ONE knows what the reason is, but it certainly HAS to be researched, tracked and investigated because as stated above this is an historic increase in 18 - 64 aged deaths and can't just be a coincidence....as are the thousands of deaths of athletes in the past 2 years.

India/Africa - so you're saying that all data in these countries in these regions of the world are bogus, faulty, manipulated, made up, and incorrect? Pretty sad that you believe only the USA and other first world "rich" countries data can be used and believed (and by default your saying first world data must always be correct and true?). I guess the rest of the world should just be written off as not trustworthy in anything related to data statistic's, science, medicine or other important endeavors since they can't be trusted to provide truthful information. Interesting take you have, even more so, that you implicitly trust the first world "rich" countries and seem to believe they could never lie, cheat or manipulate data in the name of profits, power, and/or greed. (even when presented with despicable evidence like that listed above concerning the willful hiding of Pfizer data....hmmmm, you would think with all that "extremely efficient organization" at the FDA, 18,000 employees and an annual budget of over $6.5 Billion they might be able to do better than 55 - 75 years to get the data out to the scientific community and public.....and YES, again being sarcastic here.) Also, in case you didn't know India has launched several hundred satellites into space over the past 40 years and plans to land one on the moon next year.....but hell, they can't count several million people that must have died from Covid in the past year because they are "unorganized"....I bet you could have walked across the Ganges river with those 4 million dead Covid bodies floating on down...(yes, sarcastic again as it never happened, thanks to Ivermectin!)

More Joe Lies..."This continues to be a pandemic of the unvaccinated."

Twitter - More Joe Biden lies about Covid

(07-23-2022 01:08 AM)mthomas Wrote: [ -> ]
I'm sure you're aware that a single family example has zero scientific relevance for statistical analysis.

Right so a Judge is asking for Pfizer to prove the effectiveness and safety of it's "vaccine" before giving it to children under 5 years old and they choose to attack the Judge as being "impartial"??????happened, thanks to Ivermectin!)

>I'm sure you're aware that a single family example has zero scientific relevance for statistical analysis.

It's much more than 1 family

(2021 Feb)
The BNT162b2 (BioNTech/Pfizer) vaccine had 95% efficacy against COVID-19 ≥7 days after the 2nd dose
https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/abs/10.7...alCode=aim

Effectiveness of BNT162b2 Vaccine against Omicron in Children 5 to 11 Years of Age
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NE...alization.

How many children must die or have heatlh seriously compromised before you face the facts?

(2022 Jun)
COVID-19 Vaccines for Kids Under 5: What Parents Need To Know
https://www.yalemedicine.org/news/covid-...ds-under-5

But OK, I know. The antivaxxes know a lot more than FDA authorities.

Talking about scientific relevance for statistical analaysis:
"Are the COVID vaccines safe for young children?
To receive an EUA (Emergency Use Authorization), Pfizer and Moderna separately had to present the results of clinical trials that showed their vaccines to be both safe and effective in the target age groups.
The FDA released its own analysis of the vaccines, saying they did not raise safety concerns and were effective.
We are fortunate to live in a country that has these oversights in place. And children get smaller doses than adults do, yet they mount robust antibody responses with no safety concerns.
https://www.yalemedicine.org/news/covid-...ds-under-5

FDA officials are using a standard for using the vaccine in a pandemic, but anti-vaxxes are still calling it an "experimental" drug. I don't understand how you can be comfortable with the deaths and compromised health of children.

But OK, you can bring here lots of "reliable" tweeter links about how vaccines are not good, and ivermectine works.

Quote:Talking about scientific relevance for statistical analaysis:
"Are the COVID vaccines safe for young children?
To receive an EUA (Emergency Use Authorization), Pfizer and Moderna separately had to present the results of clinical trials that showed their vaccines to be both safe and effective in the target age groups.
The FDA released its own analysis of the vaccines, saying they did not raise safety concerns and were effective.
We are fortunate to live in a country that has these oversights in place. And children get smaller doses than adults do, yet they mount robust antibody responses with no safety concerns.
https://www.yalemedicine.org/news/covid-...ds-under-5

FDA officials are using a standard for using the vaccine in a pandemic, but anti-vaxxes are still calling it an "experimental" drug. I don't understand how you can be comfortable with the deaths and compromised health of children.

But OK, you can bring here lots of "reliable" tweeter links about how vaccines are not good, and ivermectine works.

Dude (or Dudette).....
I don't get why you can't comprehend that the facts are NOT adding up and there are WAY too many inconsistencies, lies and misinformation that have come from the CDC, FDA, Pfizer and other big Pharma's, Dr. Death Fauci, Biden, Doctors, Scientists and others in on the China Virus Covid debacle...
- inconsistent ways of recording what is and what is not a covid related death....giving hospitals money for every covid related death thereby incentivizing them to misreport deaths as covid related and/or (dare I say it?) even causing people's death by not giving life-saving medications and treatments.
- non-transparency of research papers, statistics and test results (mainly from Pfizer and FDA). FDA said it would take up to 75 years to release scientific research info to the public and other scientists for scientific verification. (really? and they did this with a straight face?)
- Multiple lies coming from CDC, FDA and politicians regarding the virus, "vaccine", masks, personal distancing, ventilator's, drugs, etc. Just look at all the lies on VIDEO in the past two years coming from these so called "experts"....and I get you don't know everything and learn as you go but then don't force people to take experimental drugs, or force them to mask/shut down businesses/etc., when you have no idea if it is doing any good (it wasn't by the way as per new studies...look them up!)
- Statistical analysis that does not hold water for certain groups that have a less than 1% death rate from Covid and that includes children...there is no LOGICAL reason to give children this "vaccine" for a death rate for kids from Covid way below 1%...while the long term effects from the "vaccine" are UNKNOWN! And yes, this makes this an experimental "vaccine" as the future health consequences are UNKNOWN at this time. The potential RISKS outweigh the benefits if based on logical analysis and risk analysis (based on a less than 1% death rate for children from this virus and the possible future health risks to kids).
- totalitarian crack down on doctors that were trying to save patients by giving them Ivermectin and other drugs that statistically look to be effective against this virus (as they did in India with outstanding results compared to the rest of the world based on percentage of population/death rates)
- Also, new reports from scientists are now finding that after 8 months of a booster shot the "vaccinated" person's immune system is lower than that of an unvaccinated person....(look it up, study just came out). Maybe why Mr. Quadrupled "vaxxed" Biden got Covid the other day.
- More lies with regard to "monkey" pox.....it just never seems to end with the BS and why we should keep sticking needles into our bodies for something that has a less than 1% chance of people getting (unless you are in that group of high risk)

Again, I don't care if you want to get stuck 10000K times each year to ward off every virus, bacteria, cold, flu, pox, evil spells, vapers, etc., that is up to each person but there is NO WAY I will be forced by anyone or any Government to put something in my body AGAINST MY WILL, especially when it is untested, experimental and NO ONE has any idea what the effects will be going forward (like people dropping dead from "heart attacks" in the prime of their lives....sound familiar?)!!!!

Fu#K that!
Pure Blood For Life!

More uh oh's......

(07-25-2022 12:29 AM)mthomas Wrote: [ -> ]More uh oh's......

uh oh, indeed....

Misleading. The graph showing England’s COVID-19 death statistics misrepresents the impact of vaccines to make it appear that COVID-19 vaccines heighten chances of dying with the disease.

"Graph showing England’s COVID-19 death statistics misrepresents impact of vaccines"
Social media users are sharing a graph which shows the number of COVID-19 deaths by vaccination status in England between April 1 and May 31. It reveals that 94% of deaths in that period were among those who are vaccinated. However, this statistic on its own is misleading as it fails to acknowledge the nation’s vaccination rate. The graph also originates from a blog that has previously been found by Reuters Fact Check to have shared health misinformation.
One Facebook user, whose post has been interacted with dozens of times, uploaded a screenshot of the graph along with the caption: “Whilst in the UK the population were distracted by Boris resigning, the UK Gov. quietly published a report confirming that the vaccinated population as a whole accounted for 94% of all Covid-19 deaths in April and May 2022.”
Similar posts can be seen on Facebook and Twitter.
The graph appears on a website that has been subject to several Reuters fact-checks. The blog’s authors misrepresent data to undermine the impact of COVID-19 vaccines. Reuters has published numerous fact-checks on this technique.
Data used in the graph comes from the Office for National Statistics (ONS). It reveals that, during April and May of this year, 4,647 vaccinated people died with COVID-19, compared to 288 unvaccinated people – or roughly 94% and 6% respectively.
However, as previously reported by Reuters Fact Check, it is misleading to claim these figures show vaccinated individuals are more likely to die with COVID-19 than the unvaccinated.
A spokesperson for the Office for National Statistics told Reuters via email: “Looking at the proportion of deaths among the fully vaccinated without accounting for the vaccination rate is highly misleading. For instance, if everyone were vaccinated, 100% of people would die vaccinated.”
Echoing this, Professor of Biostatistics Elizabeth Williamson told Reuters via email that the “graph in no way indicated a negative vaccine effectiveness”.
She explained: “In a world where most people are vaccinated… we would expect to see the proportion of vaccinated people who die from COVID-19 to be lower than the proportion of unvaccinated people who die from COVID-19. At the same time, we would expect the number of vaccinated people dying from COVID-19 to be higher than unvaccinated, simply because there are so many more vaccinated people... In addition, those at the highest risk are also the most likely to be vaccinated, exacerbating this phenomenon.”
The UKHSA also previously told Reuters that, given vaccine uptake levels in England are very high, it is expected that a large proportion of cases and deaths would occur in vaccinated individuals, even with a highly effective vaccine, because a larger proportion of the population are vaccinated than unvaccinated.
Dr Shamaila Anwar, science communicator at Team Halo, previously told Reuters: “It is important to understand the whole context to avoid misunderstanding data.”
She acknowledged the importance of accounting for the demographics of vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, especially as Britain’s inoculation programme has prioritised those who are older or clinically vulnerable.
Dr Muge Cevik, a clinical lecturer in infectious diseases and medical virology at the University of St Andrews, also previously told Reuters that when the majority of people have been vaccinated, “most infections and deaths are expected to be among those vaccinated”.
According to National Health Service (NHS) data, nearly 45 million people had received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine by May 31, 2022.
https://www.reuters.com/article/factchec...SL1N2Z10I3