Best Blackhat Forum

OK in the modern landscape PR has been dead for a year. So how do you qualify the links you provide. Relevancy is everything in links. If you simply throw a group of EDU links at a property you will create an obvious footprint to Google, easy for them to pick out as manipulative and in violation to their terms of service. The end result is you risk your online real-estate. Now quality back-links can and do make a difference but mostly in terms of competitive keywords. Low hanging fruit should not need automated anything to rank. If you put irrelevant links into the mix and all the sudden have a handful of EDU links do you really think you can fool Google. They index the entire internet daily in real time. There is nothing in the history of websites statistically that they can not assess, describe and place in one of three categories. Plausible, manipulative and impossible. Ask yourself this. Is it plausible, manipulative, impossible, that a nothing website yesterday gets a dozen EDU links in a week. How bout the same nothing website that you spent tons of time building but getting 0 traffic and 0 ranking suddenly gets a bulk of profile links and edu links. Why would you hang a bulls eye on your website. Maybe you get by for a week or a month, but do not think for a minute they do not pay attention to all and I mean all the tool adds on all the forums and know what is being sold by vendors. They singly employ the largest number of Dr. level experts than any entity in the world. More DR's than the US government employs. If you value your properties then any automation should be looked at with great reservation. It is bothersome to me that the vendor here is selling a tool that uses PR as the measurement of standard of quality when PR was dropped a year ago and there is no PR on any WWW properties. regards igydog

We will change update the site list with ahrefs details on coming update.apart from these,there are no low quality backlink sites on my tools.

(09-27-2016 11:49 PM)IgyDog Wrote: [ -> ]OK in the modern landscape PR has been dead for a year. So how do you qualify the links you provide. Relevancy is everything in links. If you simply throw a group of EDU links at a property you will create an obvious footprint to Google, easy for them to pick out as manipulative and in violation to their terms of service. The end result is you risk your online real-estate. Now quality back-links can and do make a difference but mostly in terms of competitive keywords. Low hanging fruit should not need automated anything to rank. If you put irrelevant links into the mix and all the sudden have a handful of EDU links do you really think you can fool Google. They index the entire internet daily in real time. There is nothing in the history of websites statistically that they can not assess, describe and place in one of three categories. Plausible, manipulative and impossible. Ask yourself this. Is it plausible, manipulative, impossible, that a nothing website yesterday gets a dozen EDU links in a week. How bout the same nothing website that you spent tons of time building but getting 0 traffic and 0 ranking suddenly gets a bulk of profile links and edu links. Why would you hang a bulls eye on your website. Maybe you get by for a week or a month, but do not think for a minute they do not pay attention to all and I mean all the tool adds on all the forums and know what is being sold by vendors. They singly employ the largest number of Dr. level experts than any entity in the world. More DR's than the US government employs. If you value your properties then any automation should be looked at with great reservation. It is bothersome to me that the vendor here is selling a tool that uses PR as the measurement of standard of quality when PR was dropped a year ago and there is no PR on any WWW properties. regards igydog

(09-25-2016 10:59 PM)miren Wrote: [ -> ]I'm interested in the list of the sites that your tools submits. Can you send me the list of the sites and some sample links. Thanks

Am interested in this...and is still relevance i n this year though?

Hi coolclas,

Yes it was still relevant with regular updates

(10-04-2016 09:54 AM)coolclas Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-25-2016 10:59 PM)miren Wrote: [ -> ]I'm interested in the list of the sites that your tools submits. Can you send me the list of the sites and some sample links. Thanks

Am interested in this...and is still relevance i n this year though?

(09-27-2016 06:32 AM)iam_ironman Wrote: [ -> ]These are reviews from those who purchased my tools

(09-27-2016 02:40 AM)tonywhite Wrote: [ -> ]Did anyone who bought these tools experienced a really good result? Top ranking, lots of traffic, etc?

Do your ranking last?

Any experience from past buyers shared will be appreciated.

Thank you for your reply,
but I'd prefer to hear it direct from your past customers, if you guys would want to share your ACTUAL results or say something like "I bought this tool a year ago and I am having excellent results till today" then it would be great.

Visible dates are important as well.

(10-05-2016 05:48 AM)tonywhite Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-27-2016 06:32 AM)iam_ironman Wrote: [ -> ]These are reviews from those who purchased my tools

(09-27-2016 02:40 AM)tonywhite Wrote: [ -> ]Did anyone who bought these tools experienced a really good result? Top ranking, lots of traffic, etc?

Do your ranking last?

Any experience from past buyers shared will be appreciated.

Thank you for your reply,
but I'd prefer to hear it direct from your past customers, if you guys would want to share your ACTUAL results or say something like "I bought this tool a year ago and I am having excellent results till today" then it would be great.

Visible dates are important as well.

I am using all the tools since a long. All tools are working fine.
Eevn OP provide support via Skype,
I see that OP mostly update his tools with new features.
10/10 from this end.
Highly recommended.

Have been using iam_ironman SEO Tools and l can Confirm that all his tools are working Well and almost New updates every week which not more High end software are doing.

Getting Results using his tools always, Tools are there but is about how you used it with good plan.
Fully 10 Stars and Highly recommended.

Please send me the url to get in touch with support
try to update to 5.7, but error appeared. (edu submitter only, but the rest are ok)

It says, send exception.txt to programmer.

Thanks