[GET] CBTube Easy Money - Start Cashing Same Week with Lazer-Targeted Videos Ranking #1 instantly!

[azil13]

SP: http://www.warriorforum.com/warrior-spec...antly.html


DP: https://copy.com/OENo7MLsznSgqBEA

[pappu6600]

Thanks rep+ added.
Short review
First part Same as other choosing cb product after that keyword search using google and ubersuggest. Make video for each keyword nearly 7-8 video with master video upload it then mass ping it add backling such wikipedia etc. Thats it.
But only question is proof which is shown in book having year 2012-2013 sept. No recent year proof. Will work or not need to be Lets try. Thanks

[bobmcalister]

thanks for the share and the review ! we need a Thanks button...and a follow this thread option !

[MagicMan]

Thanks, REPs added!

[HunaGuy]

Nice share - thanks! Max reps added :-)

[truth hurts]

The fact that the proof is way back from 2013 says that its crap.

Don't bother.

[evybuddy]

Wikipedia backlinks?? Those are no-follow. No use of those backlinks!

[dkt1995]

thanks for the share

[tonny]

Thanks for this share

[Big Tuna]

I've been working with YouTube videos for quite some time, and I can tell you that early this year something changed with Google's love for them. It may be because every Guru told people about how easy it was to rank them, or that 1 out of every 5 WSOs over the last few years has been selling people on how easy it is to make bank with YouTube, but unfortunately, the love isn't there anymore.

I'm not saying you cannot rank a YouTube video (of course it's still easy to rank for local terms), but in terms of competitive terms, it's not anything like it used to be. A lot of my videos that were on the first page of Google were booted to the 2nd page early this year, and even when I browse the SERPS for certain terms, I can see that there are nowhere near as many videos on the first page as there was last year. But people keep releasing these crappy products about ranking YouTube videos in Google, like it's still easy to do- and giving proof from last year. Or they tell you that their product will teach you how to easily get to the first page of Google, and then you realize that their keyword gets 100 searches a month. In other words, these people are not creating WSOs based on their own experiences, instead they're likely rehashing some old WSOs and adding some variations. Or they realize that YouTube isn't working anymore, and want to cash in on the method. I read quite a lot of WSOs and other products related to YouTube this year, (maybe over 100?), and I can tell you that I haven't learned anything new from any of them. They've all been giving the same information as the one previous.