Search (advanced search) | ||||
Use this Search form before posting, asking or make a new thread.
|
02-17-2015, 02:05 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-17-2015 02:25 AM by medenlin.)
Post: #71
|
|||
|
|||
RE:
(02-02-2015 11:54 AM)luckyducky777 Wrote: *** Does this bot work on vps? I tried to "create account" and it gave me this error:Presumably it's a problem with .NET 3.5 on VPS Try to reinstall it. Bot should work correctly in any environment (hardware or VPS), but it need .NET 3.5 framework installed. If this does not help, please reply to this message, I will try to make a bot version for .NET 4.0 |
|||
02-17-2015, 02:29 AM
Post: #72
|
|||
|
|||
RE:
thanks.
From your experience, starting with 0.1BTC and use the default recommended settings how long does it take usually to reach 0.1 profit ? thanks (02-17-2015 01:46 AM)medenlin Wrote:(02-13-2015 06:53 AM)clawduda Wrote: can you recommend good settings to start from 0.1 BTC ?Download a last version and press "Begin Betting". It simple and best variant for your start balance! |
|||
02-17-2015, 02:41 AM
Post: #73
|
|||
|
|||
RE:
(02-17-2015 02:29 AM)clawduda Wrote: thanks.from few hours to 3-4 days, - as luck. ;) I running a many instances of bot with same params and theirs results 10-20 times differ. But not any "out of maney". Different time only |
|||
02-17-2015, 02:56 AM
Post: #74
|
|||
|
|||
RE:
i understand. thanks for the info.
i will test them and see :) i hope i don't end up broke :) btw what was the worst draw down on a bot for you with these settings on 0.1btc ? where you close to bankroll on a bot ? and one more question : do you find it save to remove one ZERO from the recommended settings ? for example from base bet instead of 0.00000001 to make it 0.0000001 ? 6 zeros instead of 7 do you think it is risky ? (02-17-2015 02:41 AM)medenlin Wrote:(02-17-2015 02:29 AM)clawduda Wrote: thanks.from few hours to 3-4 days, - as luck. ;) I running a many instances of bot with same params and theirs results 10-20 times differ. But not any "out of maney". Different time only |
|||
02-17-2015, 03:27 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-17-2015 03:30 AM by medenlin.)
Post: #75
|
|||
|
|||
RE:
1. I test bot continuosly about 1 week. with 0.1 start balance of BTC, DOGE and LTC.
on 1 instance of near 10 are bankroll, 1 another instance have a 96% max drawdown, but pulled back the balance without any intervention(!!!), another instances runs normally with max drowdowns about 3-40% 2. a "Base Bet" parameter not use when "AutoBaseBet" Checked. AutoBaseBet set a basebet automatically with specified percents from curren balance. You may delete a one "zero" from AutoBaseBet parameter. It's not very risky, but everything can be... :) Lather i write a detailed manual, how it works. This software now on intencieve testing stage! (02-17-2015 02:56 AM)clawduda Wrote: i understand. thanks for the info. |
|||
02-17-2015, 03:35 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-17-2015 03:47 AM by clawduda.)
Post: #76
|
|||
|
|||
RE:
thank you for the info
and for a 0.1 BTC balance , your base bet is 0.00000001 ( 7 zeroes ) correct ? can you share a print screen ? it is better this way , to see the exact settings (02-17-2015 03:27 AM)medenlin Wrote: 1. I test bot continuosly about 1 week. with 0.1 start balance of BTC, DOGE and LTC. a screenshot would make things a lot clearer post a screenshot from your bots, that would be awesome |
|||
02-17-2015, 03:52 AM
Post: #77
|
|||
|
|||
RE:
PS: Leave "enable random chances" enabled ?
it is enabled by default. Should i leave it enabled ? |
|||
02-17-2015, 03:53 AM
Post: #78
|
|||
|
|||
RE:
Yes, its normally for minimize risks.
1. In your case you may set AutoBaseBet to 0.0001% (thr start bet will be 0.0000001, and automatically increase with balance), or disable AutoBaseBet and set "Base Bet" parameter manually (in this case it will not be changed dynamically). 2. Now there is no way to do screens, if actually i do it tomorrow. (02-17-2015 03:35 AM)clawduda Wrote: thank you for the info |
|||
02-17-2015, 03:58 AM
Post: #79
|
|||
|
|||
RE: | |||
02-17-2015, 04:22 AM
Post: #80
|
|||
|
|||
RE: | |||