★★ [GET][HOT][JUST NOW 19 APR 2016] Debbie Drum - Video Marketing BLITZ ★★

[sIMplified ☢]

Hello BBHF Family

I just received this mail at 0516pm my time, and now you have a new share to feed your hard drives, or your brains. :P

Sales Page: ClickHERE

DO NOT FORGET to ANSWER POLL + Feed some REPs!

Download Page: ClickHERE

PEACE!

[sIMplified ☢]

Open for feedback

[sbrimbles]

Thank you. Rep+1

[gtbmcollins]

Thanks for sharing.

[gbear]

Thanks buddy, Max +Rep added

[happystuff]

Wow. Just saw the email fro Debbie and here it is. Thanks!

[ѕ¢σяρισ]

MyFeedback : +rep added

[yairsaumeth]

Thank you bro, awesome share. REPs given @_@

[Big Tuna]

I don't get why these courses (this one and Tube Traffic Alchemy,) are claiming that Wirecast and Live Events are the newest way to rank YouTube videos. First of all, it's been around for a pretty long time, and secondly, in my experience it doesn't do a hell of a lot. And when you consider that Wirecast will leave you with a grainy and poor quality video, ranking a few spots more just isn't worth it if it affects your conversions. Is it just me? I've done a bunch of tests (about 30), comparing Wirecast/Live Events and traditional uploading, and really haven't seen what all of the fuss is about. Pretty often I even rank better than a Live Event by just uploading the video the usual way.

[originall]

All-in-One Mirrors:

Magic Button :

http://mir.cr/0IG2IMLI

http://mediafire.com/wzudlq3x3031

https://revclouds.com/q9xnx9kcf04u