[GET] Affiloblueprint 3.0 by Mark Ling (Full Course)

[visiondark]

It seems that links on first page are dead, can you please reupload?

[sinip]

(01-29-2013 02:03 PM)visiondark Wrote:  It seems that links on first page are dead, can you please reupload?

It seems that you're too lazy to read the whole thread? So I'll help you, the links in the post #108 still work as well as the torrent link posted a bit later on.
Now I suppose that you'd like someone to download it for you, burn the DVD and send it to you nicely wrapped, for free?

[7digits]

(01-29-2013 08:32 PM)sinip Wrote:  

(01-29-2013 02:03 PM)visiondark Wrote:  It seems that links on first page are dead, can you please reupload?

It seems that you're too lazy to read the whole thread? So I'll help you, the links in the post #108 still work as well as the torrent link posted a bit later on.
Now I suppose that you'd like someone to download it for you, burn the DVD and send it to you nicely wrapped, for free?

LMAO! cool down guys

[Shakespeare]

ahhhh.....spoken like a TRUE paid BBHF VIP member........your "helpful" attitude is just sooo overwhelmeing!!!

No wait....you're not a VIP are you????

Just as well, most BBHF VIP's are usually quite willing to answer questions (even silly ones) in a respectful manner, even when the answer is soooo dam obvious.

Such helpfulness is what makes this forum the best one out there. So please, with that attitude, please consider NOT becoming a VIP - you'll shame us all!

(01-29-2013 08:32 PM)sinip Wrote:  

(01-29-2013 02:03 PM)visiondark Wrote:  It seems that links on first page are dead, can you please reupload?

It seems that you're too lazy to read the whole thread? So I'll help you, the links in the post #108 still work as well as the torrent link posted a bit later on.
Now I suppose that you'd like someone to download it for you, burn the DVD and send it to you nicely wrapped, for free?

[sinip]

Ok so lets get one thing straight. I'm the one who spent some time uploading that pretty big course, for anyone else to be able to get it, when the other links were dead. And I did it FOR FREE. Now the least thing I expect from someone looking for it, is to at least be able to get through the thread, the same way me and many else did, and NOT to expect to get everything on a silver platter. You see, "instant gratification" expectation is what is highly overrated on internet. Because even here on BBHF it is expected that you DO MAKE some effort to get what you're looking for (yes, that includes spending 15 minutes of your life reading through the thread, before concluding that the links are dead and asking for reupload). If someone is not willing to do that much, I have full right (IMHO) to bite back with a sarcastic remark. If you don't like my attitude - that's fine, it is your right, but there's nothing else you can accuse me for, in this case.

[PaulieP]

Some people are just ungreateful Sinip, even id they are VIPs, thanks for your efforts mate

[7digits]

Just download using the torrent from kat.ph

[Shakespeare]

my remark had nothing to do with your effort and time taken to upload and share. You are to be commended for that.

But why do you presume the member that was asking for reup expected "everything on a silver platter"?

How do you know that he/she wants "instant gratification"?

How do you know that the member didn't make an effort to find what they were looking for?

How could you possibly know all that by just the question being asked???

How do you know they just didn't miss the reup in this 136 post thread by accident? When a thread gets to be 28 pages long, then reups are very easy to be overlooked.

You may be right, they may have just jump to the end of the thread and asked for an easy way through, but you can't presume to know their intent by just the question they asked. Therefore, IMHO, you didn't have the right to "bite" back with a sarcastic remark.

They honestly could have missed the reup and was just asking a dam question. And like I said before, the questions asked may be silly and the answers may be obvious. But that doesn't give you the right to prejudge their intent for asking, nor does it justify your harsh response. You could have easily just directed them to the correct post with your reup and that would have been the end of it.

Again, the only thing I was pointing out was your attitude which was evidently plain by your harsh words. That is really the only point I was making. I wasn't accusing you of anything else my friend.

(02-04-2013 05:31 PM)sinip Wrote:  Ok so lets get one thing straight. I'm the one who spent some time uploading that pretty big course, for anyone else to be able to get it, when the other links were dead. And I did it FOR FREE. Now the least thing I expect from someone looking for it, is to at least be able to get through the thread, the same way me and many else did, and NOT to expect to get everything on a silver platter. You see, "instant gratification" expectation is what is highly overrated on internet. Because even here on BBHF it is expected that you DO MAKE some effort to get what you're looking for (yes, that includes spending 15 minutes of your life reading through the thread, before concluding that the links are dead and asking for reupload). If someone is not willing to do that much, I have full right (IMHO) to bite back with a sarcastic remark. If you don't like my attitude - that's fine, it is your right, but there's nothing else you can accuse me for, in this case.

[PaulieP]

(02-04-2013 09:48 PM)Shakespeare Wrote:  my remark had nothing to do with your effort and time taken to upload and share. You are to be commended for that.

But why do you presume the member that was asking for reup expected "everything on a silver platter"?

How do you know that he/she wants "instant gratification"?

How do you know that the member didn't make an effort to find what they were looking for?

How could you possibly know all that by just the question being asked???

How do you know they just didn't miss the reup in this 136 post thread by accident? When a thread gets to be 28 pages long, then reups are very easy to be overlooked.

You may be right, they may have just jump to the end of the thread and asked for an easy way through, but you can't presume to know their intent by just the question they asked. Therefore, IMHO, you didn't have the right to "bite" back with a sarcastic remark.

They honestly could have missed the reup and was just asking a dam question. And like I said before, the questions asked may be silly and the answers may be obvious. But that doesn't give you the right to prejudge their intent for asking, nor does it justify your harsh response. You could have easily just directed them to the correct post with your reup and that would have been the end of it.

Again, the only thing I was pointing out was your attitude which was evidently plain by your harsh words. That is really the only point I was making. I wasn't accusing you of anything else my friend.

(02-04-2013 05:31 PM)sinip Wrote:  Ok so lets get one thing straight. I'm the one who spent some time uploading that pretty big course, for anyone else to be able to get it, when the other links were dead. And I did it FOR FREE. Now the least thing I expect from someone looking for it, is to at least be able to get through the thread, the same way me and many else did, and NOT to expect to get everything on a silver platter. You see, "instant gratification" expectation is what is highly overrated on internet. Because even here on BBHF it is expected that you DO MAKE some effort to get what you're looking for (yes, that includes spending 15 minutes of your life reading through the thread, before concluding that the links are dead and asking for reupload). If someone is not willing to do that much, I have full right (IMHO) to bite back with a sarcastic remark. If you don't like my attitude - that's fine, it is your right, but there's nothing else you can accuse me for, in this case.

I have read your comment and it has been a while since i have so much nonsense to be honest, he had every right to put these lazy leeches in their place... Why should he give everything on a silver plater, because "maybe" they missed the links? do you realy think that they took the tie to even look... of course not, they went strait to the end of the thread and asked for a re-up.

So he had EVERY right to make those leeches understand that they have to do some work themselves to get the downloads... Your whole tirade about you being a VIP and helping EVERYBODY even with the silly questions.. and Sinip wasn't a VIP, that was way out of line imho..

But that is just me, i belief that leeches should stop asking for handholding and having everything served to them .

[Shakespeare]

Dutch...you also totally missed my point. The guy asking for a reup may be a lazy leecher, BUT...he may not be. You can suspect that he is, but to cross that line and call him that is waaaayyyy out of line imho.

You make the same mistake as sinip and maliciously slander someone just because you think you understand their intent, although you can't prove anything 100%! If you can't "prove" it, you or sinip have no place making such accusations. Your convicting a guy without fair trial. Would you want to be treated that way?

I never said anything about me being a VIP. I made that comment in reference to sinip bitching about another member wanting "instant gratification" and "everything on a silver platter" all the while he himself has no evidence and is not a VIP. And yes, most VIP's I'm familiar with won't jump to conclusions or pass judgement just because some asks for a reup. So no, my comment wasn't out of line.

That's all I'm going to say about it in this thread.