| Search (advanced search) | ||||
Use this Search form before posting, asking or make a new thread.
  | 
| 
				 
					12-19-2012, 09:00 AM 
(This post was last modified: 08-17-2013 09:52 AM by TrafficSource.)
				 
				
Post: #1 
			 | 
		|||
				
  | 
		|||
| 
				{Method} How To Get Hundreds of High PR Web2.0 Blogs For Free 
				 
					Shit ooops lol
				 
				
				
				
			 | 
		|||
| 
				 
					12-19-2012, 09:18 AM 
				 
				
Post: #2 
			 | 
		|||
				
  | 
		|||
| 
				RE: 
				 
					Can anybosy do it without scrapbox?
				 
				
				
				
			 | 
		|||
| 
				 
					12-19-2012, 09:27 AM 
				 
				
Post: #3 
			 | 
		|||
				
  | 
		|||
| 
				RE: 
				 
					Yeah you can do it with Hrefer too and I suppose you could do it with any scraper, I have just never used others so. Hrefer would be the best scraper by far. And the SB add-ons like PR checker and link checkers come in handy. But Scrapebox does have 2 link checker add-ons that are free to download. And Netpeak Checker you could use for PR. All your missing is a scraper.
				 
				
				
				
			 | 
		|||
| 
				 
					12-20-2012, 11:38 PM 
				 
				
Post: #4 
			 | 
		|||
				
  | 
		|||
| 
				RE: 
				 
					just curious what do you do with these blogs after you scrape them?
				 
				
				
				
			 | 
		|||
| 
				 
					12-22-2012, 02:34 PM 
				 
				
Post: #5 
			 | 
		|||
				
  | 
		|||
| RE: | |||
| 
				 
					12-23-2012, 08:24 AM 
				 
				
Post: #6 
			 | 
		|||
				
  | 
		|||
| RE: | |||
| 
				 
					12-24-2012, 04:34 AM 
				 
				
Post: #7 
			 | 
		|||
				
  | 
		|||
| 
				RE: 
				 
					Thanks for post..very helpful :)
				 
				
				
				
			 | 
		|||
| 
				 
					12-24-2012, 04:36 AM 
				 
				
Post: #8 
			 | 
		|||
				
  | 
		|||
| 
				RE: 
				 
					let me check.. 
				
				
				
			thanks for share this method.. very helpfull ;)  | 
		|||
| 
				 
					12-30-2012, 11:54 PM 
				 
				
Post: #9 
			 | 
		|||
				
  | 
		|||
| 
				RE: 
				 
					I dont know if there is a typo in this guide. 
				
				
				
			But i get way more results by using theese footprints: ".tumblr.com/post/" {1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|0}{1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|0}{1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|0}{1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|0} ".tumblr.com/post/" {1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|0}{1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|0}{1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|0} ".tumblr.com/post/" {1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|0}{1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|0} ".tumblr.com/post/" {1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|0}  | 
		|||
| 
				 
					01-03-2013, 06:33 AM 
				 
				
Post: #10 
			 | 
		|||
				
  | 
		|||
				RE: 
				(12-30-2012 11:54 PM)Nigux Wrote: I dont know if there is a typo in this guide.No typo closing your string at /" will probably give you more result but 90% of them will be duplicates. Your running a scrape on up to 1 billion numerical variants so you need to "" to wrap around the number string with no space between / and the number. Trust the man.  | 
		|||


							
							
				
