[GET] Simple CPA Machines

[mark64490]

Thanks to the OP and also for the reviews, was about to download and still might out of morbid curiousity :) I too in my mail got a glowing review from an affiliate [ http://brettrutecky.com/Training-detail/...es-review/ ] hard to believe this is the same product, getting jaded as I'm happy to pay for decent products but they are thin on the ground these days... Is there anyone that knows of a truly impartial review site (apart from here of course) guessing that would be as hard to find as rocking horse s**t (edit full reps given to all)

[tristan]

I think he tries to be impartial, in that I don't believe he'd recommend a product he'd consider to be bad. I admire the way he states his opinion and tries to get fixed what he thinks is broken.

The problem is, he's well informed in some areas but ignorant in others. So his opinion, while impartial, isn't always very valuable. Sometimes it's stunningly off-base. I've read two reviews where he recommended against products that were outstanding and his explicit explanations were laughable but he did not know enough to realize the fact. I am of the opinion that his recommendations are well intentioned and without any bias other than that derived from ignorance of the topic.

Concerning this product ... I think the concept of sending FB traffic to a squeeze page, with the income being mostly derived from the activities of an autoresponder series, is extremely basic. He was open enough in his review to say, he'd never thought of it but realized that he should have. So, something that's obvious to many was an eye-opener to him and his recommendation seems to me to have been honest. He just doesn't know what he doesn't know. To the right people, those to whom this tactic was a revelation, his recommendation might indeed have been valuable.

So the challenge isn't just to find an honest reviewer, it's to find one who knows enough to offer opinions on those topics on which he or she is an authority but has enough knowledge and a sufficiently small ego to admit when they don't know their arse from their elbow.

[johnvanhoorn]

Thanks BlackDahlia. Nice share. Rep added.

[bhforum14]

well said. I totally agree with you

(05-09-2015 06:49 PM)tristan Wrote:  I think he tries to be impartial, in that I don't believe he'd recommend a product he'd consider to be bad. I admire the way he states his opinion and tries to get fixed what he thinks is broken.

The problem is, he's well informed in some areas but ignorant in others. So his opinion, while impartial, isn't always very valuable. Sometimes it's stunningly off-base. I've read two reviews where he recommended against products that were outstanding and his explicit explanations were laughable but he did not know enough to realize the fact. I am of the opinion that his recommendations are well intentioned and without any bias other than that derived from ignorance of the topic.

Concerning this product ... I think the concept of sending FB traffic to a squeeze page, with the income being mostly derived from the activities of an autoresponder series, is extremely basic. He was open enough in his review to say, he'd never thought of it but realized that he should have. So, something that's obvious to many was an eye-opener to him and his recommendation seems to me to have been honest. He just doesn't know what he doesn't know. To the right people, those to whom this tactic was a revelation, his recommendation might indeed have been valuable.

So the challenge isn't just to find an honest reviewer, it's to find one who knows enough to offer opinions on those topics on which he or she is an authority but has enough knowledge and a sufficiently small ego to admit when they don't know their arse from their elbow.

[OnceWild]

We can still learn something from many of this type of material.

I think that is what makes BBHF so valuable, we can review something before spending our hard earned money.

+5 Reps - Thank you very much for this awesome share!