(11-28-2013 09:15 PM)narciszu Wrote: [ -> ]All scripts from Eicra works great only if you use complete packages. And nulled, of course.
@Cimmerian. I think you don't have idea about how to null these scripts. No offense. You don't need to decode and rebuild installer. I have one working full open source distribution (version 2.9.5) and I know very well what I'm talking about. I know everything in the original source code and you are wrong.
More than that, I think scarf1 not bought this script from someone because was released for free. With two exceptions (AzuwaB2B and RealEstate), all others was released for free (versions 2.9.2).
you're mistaking brother. these eicra scripts are all only partially nulled. they are nulled in the sence of making them installable. to make it happen, installation has been tweaked. all the rest left untouched. unfortunately, everything in eicra is ioncube encoded, but zend framework itself. and there are no tools today to properly decode ioncube, you have to rebuild the code after decoding. that's exactly what i meant talking about revuilding code.
having so many file undecoded makes eicra scripts virtually unusable, as they contain so many link-backs and call-backs to the developer. in reality this means your new installation will be reported to the developer right away, and from that moment on existance of your site will depend on the developer's good will only.
to null eicra properly, you need to decode _all_ the files, and then reconstruct what has been lost in the process.
this is doable, but extremely time consuming. thus, not worthwile, as eicra is built in zf1, while currect version is zf2, which is completely different and much more effective. plus there is zf3 on the horizon. that's why i doubt anybody would be interested in reconstructing eicra and porting in to zf2.
as for the code itself, i have it all decoded, but not working for the reasons i described.
at the same time, i found several clearly visible, but nevertherless not fixed errors in the files decoded for the current null. it's not very much important, as installation is working quite fine. but - at least for me - it would be interesting to discuss this with the one who really nulled the script. just a little pro chit-chat, you know.
unfortunately, i don't know who did the job, as all those who clame they did right now, obviously did not: i've conversed with them in pm, they are not qualifyed.
still looking for the source :)
have a good day, bro!
p.s. you are right in a sence, actually: i don't quote exact files where the null has been applied. just because i don't remember: i looked through them a couple of weeks ago, and moved on to other things. i can find those files and explain what i'm talking about showing lines of code, no problem, but as i said still didn't find that genious, who did the null.