11-08-2025, 10:32 PM
![[Image: fsdfsdfsdsdf.png]](https://i.postimg.cc/7YwMtQvC/fsdfsdfsdsdf.png)
11-11-2025, 12:22 AM
![[Image: sdffsdsdfsdf.png]](https://i.postimg.cc/mkPYStK2/sdffsdsdfsdf.png)
11-11-2025, 09:11 PM
Real user account created 11 years ago with 74,729 Karma
![[Image: sdfsfdfsd.png]](https://i.postimg.cc/Vkhf5wH4/sdfsfdfsd.png)
11-14-2025, 12:16 AM
Sales Navigator Account
![[Image: sfdsdfsfdsdfsdf.png]](https://i.postimg.cc/k44gFmK8/sfdsdfsfdsdfsdf.png)
11-14-2025, 11:51 PM
(05-20-2024 02:01 AM)lifeofriley Wrote: [ -> ]Definitely looking to expand into TikTok will be reaching out adding on telegram now
OK bro
11-16-2025, 01:15 AM
A large expense account of ours
![[Image: 321123123132.png]](https://i.postimg.cc/hGWt9Xbg/321123123132.png)
11-22-2025, 10:41 PM
? Need stable Facebook ad accounts? We offer BM + aged personal ad accounts + Profile + Payment + replacement support (from 2% service fee)
WHICH ADVERTISING ACCOUNTS ARE YOU USING FOR FACEBOOK ADS? WHILE THE BM ACCOUNT IS BEING BANNED IN MASS AND THE PERSONAL ACCOUNT IS DEFECTIVE, SO YOU CANNOT INCREASE THE SPENDING BUDGET, WHAT IS THE SOLUTION?
We currently offer the only well-managed account types in the market with no payment errors. Other agencies often use Business Manager (BM) or blank personal accounts with no spending history. However, BM accounts are frequently mass-banned. In contrast, we are the only provider offering accounts with real user spending history — ensuring stable performance and eliminating payment errors for sustainable ad campaigns.
Hi
We know the pain of scaling Facebook Ads while dealing with:
• Disabled accounts
• Identity verification loops
• Spending caps
• Delayed replacements
That’s why we provide a full ad account infrastructure solution for serious media buyers:
What’s included:
• We also provide aged personal ad accounts created between 2008–2010, with real spend history and short user IDs (8–10 digits). These accounts are highly trusted by the platform and are ideal for running high-volume or sensitive verticals.
• Business Manager (BM2500+, BM700, BM350) • Verified Facebook profile (ID verified, aged 2008–2012) • Linked payment method (Visa / VCC)
• Page + Pixel setup
• Account replacement guarantee if banned
• 24/7 support
Pricing:
• 1-5% fee based on daily spend
• As low as 2% for invoice billing or large budget accounts ($50k+/day) We also offer trusted, aged Facebook profiles (with ID and spend history) that can be added to your BM — ideal for stability, bypassing frequent flagging and smoother launch.
? Contact me if you’re tired of wasting time on recovery, and just want to focus on scaling.
? Ready to scale your ads without worrying about bans or setup? Let us handle the messy part — you run the campaigns.
WHICH ADVERTISING ACCOUNTS ARE YOU USING FOR FACEBOOK ADS? WHILE THE BM ACCOUNT IS BEING BANNED IN MASS AND THE PERSONAL ACCOUNT IS DEFECTIVE, SO YOU CANNOT INCREASE THE SPENDING BUDGET, WHAT IS THE SOLUTION?
We currently offer the only well-managed account types in the market with no payment errors. Other agencies often use Business Manager (BM) or blank personal accounts with no spending history. However, BM accounts are frequently mass-banned. In contrast, we are the only provider offering accounts with real user spending history — ensuring stable performance and eliminating payment errors for sustainable ad campaigns.
Hi
We know the pain of scaling Facebook Ads while dealing with:
• Disabled accounts
• Identity verification loops
• Spending caps
• Delayed replacements
That’s why we provide a full ad account infrastructure solution for serious media buyers:
What’s included:
• We also provide aged personal ad accounts created between 2008–2010, with real spend history and short user IDs (8–10 digits). These accounts are highly trusted by the platform and are ideal for running high-volume or sensitive verticals.
• Business Manager (BM2500+, BM700, BM350) • Verified Facebook profile (ID verified, aged 2008–2012) • Linked payment method (Visa / VCC)
• Page + Pixel setup
• Account replacement guarantee if banned
• 24/7 support
Pricing:
• 1-5% fee based on daily spend
• As low as 2% for invoice billing or large budget accounts ($50k+/day) We also offer trusted, aged Facebook profiles (with ID and spend history) that can be added to your BM — ideal for stability, bypassing frequent flagging and smoother launch.
? Contact me if you’re tired of wasting time on recovery, and just want to focus on scaling.
? Ready to scale your ads without worrying about bans or setup? Let us handle the messy part — you run the campaigns.
11-24-2025, 06:48 PM
(04-23-2025 10:58 AM)Ruark Wrote: [ -> ](04-23-2025 02:47 AM)Ruark Wrote: [ -> ]I am co-owner of small online retail store clothing merch business.
I have $5000 budget, the site is currently on front page on 2nd result.
We want it to be on top. The first one to be click. Is this possible ?
By the way your site when i click on top banner of BBHF does not not load.
Bump. Waiting for reply. I send pm on your telegram too. Please check. $5000 budget i can pay half first for me to test it $2500. Thanks.
It's a pleasure to work with you.
11-25-2025, 07:48 PM
How to expand your advertising budget to optimize ?
Let me share what's working for most of the accounts I manage. The prospecting vs support ad framework is good but what most people miss is the attribution complexity that happens when you're running this many concurrent creatives... you need much more sophisticated tracking setups to understand which prospecting ads are actually feeding your support ads effectively.
Frequency targeting approach works well but I've found you also need to layer in engagement-based exclusions between your prospecting and support campaigns... otherwise you get auction overlap where Facebook is deciding which of your own ads should win against each other.
For accounts spending $200k-$500k+ monthly, this internal competition can inflate CPMs by 20-30% if not managed properly.
One thing I'd add is the importance of creative refresh cycles at this scale... those 400+ day ad runs are impressive but you need systematic testing pipelines to replace them before they fatigue.
I typically see performance start declining around the 6-month mark even for winning creatives, so having 15-20 new prospects in testing weekly becomes essential for maintaining spend levels.
CPA variance between prospecting and support is exactly right but the real optimization happens when you sync this with your email and SMS attribution... your prospecting ads should be feeding customer data back to retention channels through enhanced conversions, and those channels should be informing your LAL creation for new prospecting campaigns.
Most agencies treat Facebook in isolation but the brands scaling past ≈$10k-20k daily have integrated attribution across all touchpoints.
Also worth mentioning that the 30/60/10 split changes pretty dramatically based on customer LTV and purchase cycles... subscription businesses can run higher prospecting percentages because the payback period is longer, while one-time purchase brands need more support ad density to hit profitability targets.
The campaign structure is clean though... I've seen too many accounts try to over-segment at this scale and end up hurting the algorithm's learning efficiency.
Keeping everything in one CBO with proper audience exclusions usually outperforms complex multi-campaign setups for most verticals.
Let me share what's working for most of the accounts I manage. The prospecting vs support ad framework is good but what most people miss is the attribution complexity that happens when you're running this many concurrent creatives... you need much more sophisticated tracking setups to understand which prospecting ads are actually feeding your support ads effectively.
Frequency targeting approach works well but I've found you also need to layer in engagement-based exclusions between your prospecting and support campaigns... otherwise you get auction overlap where Facebook is deciding which of your own ads should win against each other.
For accounts spending $200k-$500k+ monthly, this internal competition can inflate CPMs by 20-30% if not managed properly.
One thing I'd add is the importance of creative refresh cycles at this scale... those 400+ day ad runs are impressive but you need systematic testing pipelines to replace them before they fatigue.
I typically see performance start declining around the 6-month mark even for winning creatives, so having 15-20 new prospects in testing weekly becomes essential for maintaining spend levels.
CPA variance between prospecting and support is exactly right but the real optimization happens when you sync this with your email and SMS attribution... your prospecting ads should be feeding customer data back to retention channels through enhanced conversions, and those channels should be informing your LAL creation for new prospecting campaigns.
Most agencies treat Facebook in isolation but the brands scaling past ≈$10k-20k daily have integrated attribution across all touchpoints.
Also worth mentioning that the 30/60/10 split changes pretty dramatically based on customer LTV and purchase cycles... subscription businesses can run higher prospecting percentages because the payback period is longer, while one-time purchase brands need more support ad density to hit profitability targets.
The campaign structure is clean though... I've seen too many accounts try to over-segment at this scale and end up hurting the algorithm's learning efficiency.
Keeping everything in one CBO with proper audience exclusions usually outperforms complex multi-campaign setups for most verticals.
11-26-2025, 08:50 PM
(05-18-2025 01:24 PM)nonamerap99 Wrote: [ -> ]I texted you please reply meThanks you bro