(05-08-2021 04:35 PM)smithnowt Wrote: [ -> ]There is some very good info posted in replies to this thread - so long as one 100% ignores the spamming done at replies # 6 and 7.
(Everything in the OP remains true despite the gibberish in those useless and unhelpful replies.)
I'm sorry, spamming? I think I asked a legitimate question, and I was really curious as to what you'd answer.
But I guess conspiracy theories are only for those who just nod, agree and don't ask questions. If you do, you are a "spammer".
For anyone reading this thread, you should look out for how all these posts are long, contain big words like "genocide", but lack any specific evidence whatsoever.
The most glaring example of this is the section where it refers to the "official Pfizer COVID “Vaccination” medical bioweapon" document.
Where's the link to it? No link, but you can find it on page 14 of some "cease and desist" letter. Okay.
So what's on page 14? It's the exact same quote from who-knows-where with a reference to a site called "tapnewswire.com" (sounds like a credible source, right?). Once again, no link to "Pfizer's official document".
If you go to that link on tapnewswire.com, however, there's a link that refers to this same document, and leads to a 146-page pdf that has a Pfizer logo on it.
Here it is:
I haven't read that one through, but it could be legit. There are two issues, however.
#1 The download link leads to tghn.org which is the website of an unknown organisation called "The Global Health Network", not from Pfizer's website, and not any sort of official source. So it could easily be a doctored version of the original.
#2 Nowhere in that document can you find that quoted section that starts with "(1). If a man who was not vaccinated touches a vaccinated woman..." yada, yada.
I know this was probably a waste of my time, but I just wanted to point out the most obvious incongruencies.
But really all you have to do is look at the wording of that quoted section. Show me an official Pfizer document where they say things like "he then has sex with his wife" and other such nonsense.
I really tried to look at this thing with an open mind, because who knows? Maybe the official narrative is a lie, and you can never know unless you actually look into the other side.
But after actually looking into it, my verdict is that this appears to be just a bunch of made-up bollocks.
Good day to you all.