08-30-2019, 03:07 AM
08-30-2019, 04:43 AM
for Sharing dear Chrome; for the awesome review blackhatbill; and for OTOs papapanda; Reps added08-30-2019, 07:30 AM
Amazing Share! 
Max reps given to Chrome, blackhatbill and papapanda!
08-30-2019, 05:11 PM
thank you Chrome, blackhatbill, papapanda
08-31-2019, 02:37 AM
Big thanks to chrome, blackhatbill and papapanda for the great shares, Repped
08-31-2019, 03:49 AM
Does anyone have any ideas on how to download everything on the download pages as quickly as possible? thanks for any help you may give me.
08-31-2019, 04:02 AM
(08-31-2019 03:49 AM)pmadison Wrote: [ -> ]Does anyone have any ideas on how to download everything on the download pages as quickly as possible? thanks for any help you may give me.
Try to feed Jdownloader with the page you want to download from.
08-31-2019, 10:46 AM
A few comments to add to blackhatbill's review, which I greatly appreciated.
First, I want to emphasize that the tactic BHB points out of making the shift from the exact same product being promoted as a short-lived launch target to it being promoted as an Evergreen product that doesn't even mention the product name in the Video Title is HUGE.
Yes, it means you can be searched for and get sales for a long time because you are not product-bound during a launch. But it's actually VITAL to the other aspect of the "big views" strategy, getting to be Recommended alongside the big-view videos you piggy-back on.
The iPassive guy points out it can be weeks or months before YT suddenly recognizes that you make a good Recommended Video. So that recognition would be a non-starter if associated with a short launch and even if you DID piggyback on some other short launch video, so what? Few views and the interest is long gone!
Mr. B Dean has a YouTube course that is 100% dedicated to the strategy of becoming Recommended. Deliberately optimizing for Recommended status NOT for being ranked for keywords. The strategy is COMPLETELY different from the git-go than the strategy of being ranked for a search term. I noticed the guy's comment in iPassive that only 1 or 2 in 8 of his videos made it to "Recommended" status. Mr. Dean's course might boost those odds.
Also very clever -- as picked up again by blackhatbill but I want to make it a bigger deal again. It's not just a Title change from the product name to an Evergreen topic. His conversion rates are because of the video structure where he can make the video about the topic -- earn $$ from doing something -- with NO MENTION whatsoever until the very end that there's a product to help you do it.
All the attention that gets someone to the video is based around "That how-to sounds like something I'd like to do," then as they go through the video and see some How-To's they get the Aha moments but also see that it's a bit labor-intensive ... these are 10 - 12 minute videos remember, not short takes ... then at the end "Oh and if that sounds good, how'd you like to automate it and eliminate all the labor-intensive stuff?" And THEN comes the heads-up towards the product. The single biggest objection that's been growing in the viewers mind, killed in a split second.
And a key point here that gets mentioned: the bloke and his mentor did similar videos on the same product and similar titles on the same piggyback but the mentor did a LOT better. The difference seems to be that the mentor said up-front "stay til the end for something that will make it 10X faster or make it 10X easier" (or some such). Because of course if they don't stay, with this strategy they don't get the pitch. So the CTA to watch to the end makes a difference.
So the structure is very important but doing it right is obviously very effective.
Someone else -- Mr M Bishop perhaps? Maybe a different decent marketer -- built an entire product strategy a year or 2 ago around doing this with either Blog Posts or pdf docs, I disremember. "Here's how to do something you didn't know about, that makes money, it's really effective, but it is a bit hard to do manually, I agree -- but look here, if you want to automate it, here's something that will help ..."
This is on a completely different marketing level to "Here's a review (like everyone else's), I got bonuses (like everyone else's), buy it."
And on an entirely different scale again, a certain Mr F Kern has a version of this when he sells $10K a month services, with one of the most brilliant Sales Closes I've ever encountered. After a free coaching call with a pre-qualified prospect, during which he and the prospect work out a solid plan of how the prospect can do something that will add 6- figures a month profit, with the prospect providing all the numbers and making the case for himself, Mr Kern asks, "How do you feel about this plan?" The inevitable answer is "Great!" -- inevitable because the prospect helped develop it and used numbers he had himself provided! Mr Kern then casually drops the superb Close ... "Would you like me to help with that. moving forward?" That's his ENTIRE sales pitch.
Delivered immediately after the prospect just discovered 7-figures untapped profits just waiting to be banked if he only executed correctly ... with 10 words he just removed 99% of the work and the risk.
Gotta love this business.
First, I want to emphasize that the tactic BHB points out of making the shift from the exact same product being promoted as a short-lived launch target to it being promoted as an Evergreen product that doesn't even mention the product name in the Video Title is HUGE.
Yes, it means you can be searched for and get sales for a long time because you are not product-bound during a launch. But it's actually VITAL to the other aspect of the "big views" strategy, getting to be Recommended alongside the big-view videos you piggy-back on.
The iPassive guy points out it can be weeks or months before YT suddenly recognizes that you make a good Recommended Video. So that recognition would be a non-starter if associated with a short launch and even if you DID piggyback on some other short launch video, so what? Few views and the interest is long gone!
Mr. B Dean has a YouTube course that is 100% dedicated to the strategy of becoming Recommended. Deliberately optimizing for Recommended status NOT for being ranked for keywords. The strategy is COMPLETELY different from the git-go than the strategy of being ranked for a search term. I noticed the guy's comment in iPassive that only 1 or 2 in 8 of his videos made it to "Recommended" status. Mr. Dean's course might boost those odds.
Also very clever -- as picked up again by blackhatbill but I want to make it a bigger deal again. It's not just a Title change from the product name to an Evergreen topic. His conversion rates are because of the video structure where he can make the video about the topic -- earn $$ from doing something -- with NO MENTION whatsoever until the very end that there's a product to help you do it.
All the attention that gets someone to the video is based around "That how-to sounds like something I'd like to do," then as they go through the video and see some How-To's they get the Aha moments but also see that it's a bit labor-intensive ... these are 10 - 12 minute videos remember, not short takes ... then at the end "Oh and if that sounds good, how'd you like to automate it and eliminate all the labor-intensive stuff?" And THEN comes the heads-up towards the product. The single biggest objection that's been growing in the viewers mind, killed in a split second.
And a key point here that gets mentioned: the bloke and his mentor did similar videos on the same product and similar titles on the same piggyback but the mentor did a LOT better. The difference seems to be that the mentor said up-front "stay til the end for something that will make it 10X faster or make it 10X easier" (or some such). Because of course if they don't stay, with this strategy they don't get the pitch. So the CTA to watch to the end makes a difference.
So the structure is very important but doing it right is obviously very effective.
Someone else -- Mr M Bishop perhaps? Maybe a different decent marketer -- built an entire product strategy a year or 2 ago around doing this with either Blog Posts or pdf docs, I disremember. "Here's how to do something you didn't know about, that makes money, it's really effective, but it is a bit hard to do manually, I agree -- but look here, if you want to automate it, here's something that will help ..."
This is on a completely different marketing level to "Here's a review (like everyone else's), I got bonuses (like everyone else's), buy it."
And on an entirely different scale again, a certain Mr F Kern has a version of this when he sells $10K a month services, with one of the most brilliant Sales Closes I've ever encountered. After a free coaching call with a pre-qualified prospect, during which he and the prospect work out a solid plan of how the prospect can do something that will add 6- figures a month profit, with the prospect providing all the numbers and making the case for himself, Mr Kern asks, "How do you feel about this plan?" The inevitable answer is "Great!" -- inevitable because the prospect helped develop it and used numbers he had himself provided! Mr Kern then casually drops the superb Close ... "Would you like me to help with that. moving forward?" That's his ENTIRE sales pitch.
Delivered immediately after the prospect just discovered 7-figures untapped profits just waiting to be banked if he only executed correctly ... with 10 words he just removed 99% of the work and the risk.
Gotta love this business.
09-01-2019, 08:18 AM
Chrome, Blackhatbill, Papapanda, Tristan +reps
09-01-2019, 05:56 PM
It is basically a course on how to become the next lying ass doucheb@g on youtube.
Also, nobody likes videos with robot voices... I don't get why people are giving it rave reviews because all it learns you is how to make a review video woth oudated techniques, there is much better content then this crap
I give it a 3 out of 10
Paul
Also, nobody likes videos with robot voices... I don't get why people are giving it rave reviews because all it learns you is how to make a review video woth oudated techniques, there is much better content then this crap
I give it a 3 out of 10
Paul