Best Blackhat Forum

Collecion of Scientology "SECRET" Stuff in other words Comlete Library of Elron Hubards stuff.
And btw. If any one is thinking bout joining the church I would Strongly Advice Against It! They have some good stuff like emeter (wich I tested out and its very interesting) and so on, but church is nothing more than money grabbing CULT!

Size: 3.3Gb

Download: https://mega.nz/#!X1NWWIZC!Bd_wNCTuaT4GS...Iw2WRJBuKs


Password starts with a big B instead of a b every thing else is default.


Enjoy :)


List: (what does not have .* is a folder)

ABILITY 0-192 (journal)
AUDITORS (journal)
Books
Books chrono
BPL
BTB pdf
BTB scanned
BTBs_and_BPLs
COURSE
COURSE chrono
DICTIONARIES
DICTIONARY'S and GLOSSARY'S
Grade_Chart_1970.pdf
Grade_Chart_1974.pdf
Grade_Chart_1978.pdf
Grade_Chart_26.Sept.1965.zip
Guardian's Office
HCO PLs
HCOB BTB PAB etc
HCOPL BPL
IEM
INDEX
Listen Assesment
LRH ARTIKEL DIV
LRHEDs
MANAGEMENT_SERIES
OCA
PURIFICATION
RED-BlUE VOLUMES
Reference
ROOTS OF THE OTC
SCANNED ISSUES
Scientology and lists
Tapes in order
Tapes&Lect
Tapes&Lect chrono
unsorted different
_Scientology (journal)
_THE OFFICIAL LIST OF BOOKS and MATERIALS.RTF

L. Ron Hubbard, founder of the "Church" (aka: cult) of Scientology was a Pulp Science Fiction writer in the 1930's ..... that should pretty much sum up the BS of all his "Religious" doctrines.

(04-28-2019 12:31 AM)mthomas Wrote: [ -> ]L. Ron Hubbard, founder of the "Church" (aka: cult) of Scientology was a Pulp Science Fiction writer in the 1930's ..... that should pretty much sum up the BS of all his "Religious" doctrines.

1st a disclaimer: I do not like Scientology or their church. I tested out Emeter and their cleaning or detox theraphy and that was Ok and interesting... and I can see how methods like this are used to pull people in... but still
2nd question: I would really like to know... from you... what would you call Jezus and the Bible then? And even more important question.... if this is "Science Fiction" What is Real For You?! And how do You Know that is True?

(04-28-2019 09:53 AM)Znj1377 Wrote: [ -> ]

(04-28-2019 12:31 AM)mthomas Wrote: [ -> ]L. Ron Hubbard, founder of the "Church" (aka: cult) of Scientology was a Pulp Science Fiction writer in the 1930's ..... that should pretty much sum up the BS of all his "Religious" doctrines.

1st a disclaimer: I do not like Scientology or their church. I tested out Emeter and their cleaning or detox theraphy and that was Ok and interesting... and I can see how methods like this are used to pull people in... but still
2nd question: I would really like to know... from you... what would you call Jezus and the Bible then? And even more important question.... if this is "Science Fiction" What is Real For You?!

Good questions...
- And I won't try to answer this from a single one religion viewpoint (as in, I'm a Christian or Muslim and therefore I believe this to be true and every other religion is BS). No, you can be religious or an atheist, and see that just about every religion (east and west) has elements of the unbelievable (or can't be proven aspects, i.e. life after death, heaven and hell, etc.) and therefore you must have faith in order to believe in it. (examples include: Christ being the son of God (holy trinity) and rising from the dead. Hindus/Buddists believing in reincarnation, Jews believing in God and the prophet Moses parting of the Red Sea, Muslims believing in God sending the archangel Gabriel to Muhammad to give him revelations (what ultimately became the Koran), etc....

So yeah, you can argue every religion has aspects of the unknown and therefore can be seen as fiction (at least to atheists or non believers) but my comment on Scientology and L. Ron Hubbard being a Pulp Science Fiction writer is a fact. And like a detective, given this fact, I'd say it's more than a little suspicious (or in my view, VERY obvious) that this so called "religion" is little more than a figment of his imagination and taken from the pages of his many science fiction novels/short stories.
Hey, I'm not saying you shouldn't believe it, I'm a live and let live kind of guy. And yes, as outlined above you can argue that any religion has fictional area's that can be debated, but this is kind of like arguing that bigfoot or the lochness monsters are real things.

So if you don't know, I'll save you over $100K + in Scientology Tests or Audits and tell you that this "religion" believes in the following (taken off a website):

"A central belief is that 75 million years ago, 13.5 trillion aliens were banished to Earth by a warlord called Xenu. To compound their misfortune, these exiled aliens were dropped into volcanoes and vaporised with nuclear bombs.

Their souls, known to Scientologists as thetans, then latched on to humans. They believe these thetans are the source of many of our problems, both emotional and social.

To become at ease with one's unconscious self a person must take part in a series of "audits" with a trained Scientology counsellor."

Now you can believe that if you want.....
But if you do, I have a Great Deal on this bridge in Brooklyn that's for sale, you'll love it and it's a bargain, really....I wouldn't make this stuff up.

Oh, and as for other religions and there authenticity, yeah, we can argue that for eons (they already have) but I'd say the more important aspect in debate would be the ultimate reason for the start of the religion...Jews = One God, Jesus = Love they fellow people, etc. So I guess a religion can start with good intentions and turn bad and vise versa start out as made up BS and turn into something that helps people.

Unfortunately, in the case of Scientology it seems it started out in BS and is doing more harm than good up to this day. It's more a cult than a real religion. (in my opinion).

But hey, everyone is free to believe in what they want (or to not believe anything).

many thanks full reps

If you say so :) mthomas
But still... from my point of view. 2 Belive is not to Know :)