Best Blackhat Forum

Thanks a lot, very useful. Repped.

Thanks for the share...

Any review?

(12-29-2018 03:54 AM)Johny321 Wrote: [ -> ]art of scamming academy it should be renamed, here is a interesting video exposing scam artist ART!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLTlmC-PsGk

I think this video is NOT FOR THIS FORUM ( maybe for the nazi forum, really)

Basically, this guy is not saying anything with value, only to HATE.

He looks on the spam folder to find an email and from that email, he begins to search more and more about this marketers, he laughs about the face of one of them, the promotions they made, the Facebook profile... really a disgusting attitude.

I think people that are moving forward and doing something, like those marketers, is the correct way to go. And this guy of the video, is not teaching us anything, he doesn't build anything, only trying to destroy others.

There is no exposing of nothing. He shows the salespage and laughs.

I believe that this is the problem for everyone, because one of the biggest challenges we have, the ones we want to grow, is the fear of not being perfect, to make a ridiculous and finally, we do not take action.

In one part of the video, he said that "some words are spam" in the email, clearly showing that he also is in the internet marketing world, just without success.

The BestBlackhatForum was always a place to share friendly and to grow together. I hope that the video-post full of hate will be banned.

Thank you

Thanks for the share no matter what!

Interesting.
These 2 guys came up with a course last week (or so) where they pointed buyers to a couple of big-ticket funnels that paid them a big commission when anyone bought-in; and the majority of the course was, ways to get traffic to those courses. So they made money by persuading people to buy their course ... which persuaded people to invest in somethings that made them more commissions. Clever.

Well, this is more of the same. This time the Front End is a Facebook marketing approach that can be used to send people to any offers. But guess which offers they give precedence to? Yup. The same 2 funnels (plus a 3rd).

The FB approach has value but isn't new. They point out that the open rates and click-through rates on emails are lousy (in the IM world, anyway). So what they do is 3 things.
They create a Review Blog Post for Warrior+ offers on a Wordpress Blog, a review that links to the sales page of course. Then they create a custom audience in FB from their email lists. Then they use 15-second video ads on FB aimed at their custom audience (so, no targeting) which send people to their reviews.

They claim that FB ads aimed at their lists gets much better results than emailing to their lists (but they do both, of course).

They claim that Fb ads aimed to a sales page would be rejected by FB (true). But by sending traffic to a review page, they are OK. Their case studies in OTO1 suggest this is valid.

Oh, and if you don't have a list ... they just choose a W+ offer and create a squeeze page using the same headline and images and design features as the sales letter, for consistency.

I know a lot of folks here knock these guys (especially AF) for rehashed content. But these folks goal is presumably to make money and they appear to be doing a creditable job of doing it.

@onlmaker Thanks for the share

(12-29-2018 04:10 AM)Johny321 Wrote: [ -> ]people shud be even ashamed to share this shit!

On the one hand, I feel your pain.
However, sharing this helps save us
money because now we don't have to
buy this shit to see that it is shit.

When I see something from Art Flair or the rest of the usual click I'll take it with a grain of salt, I'm mean lets be honest these guys put out products every few weeks and how can they even test the validity of a method in that amount of time. simple answer is that the products are (BULLSHIT).

(01-03-2019 04:58 AM)chaff Wrote: [ -> ]When I see something from Art Flair or the rest of the usual click I'll take it with a grain of salt, I'm mean lets be honest these guys put out products every few weeks and how can they even test the validity of a method in that amount of time. simple answer is that the products are (BULLSHIT).

exactly, how will they test the validity of the method but see some of the posts above them supporting these idiots, these folks should be ideally working in a pizzeria not selling im courses, recently paypal has started to ban lot of accounts, and art flair and his new partner in crime pallab ghoshal both should face the wrath soon

---

(12-31-2018 09:40 PM)tristan Wrote: [ -> ]Interesting.
These 2 guys came up with a course last week (or so) where they pointed buyers to a couple of big-ticket funnels that paid them a big commission when anyone bought-in; and the majority of the course was, ways to get traffic to those courses. So they made money by persuading people to buy their course ... which persuaded people to invest in somethings that made them more commissions. Clever.

Well, this is more of the same. This time the Front End is a Facebook marketing approach that can be used to send people to any offers. But guess which offers they give precedence to? Yup. The same 2 funnels (plus a 3rd).

The FB approach has value but isn't new. They point out that the open rates and click-through rates on emails are lousy (in the IM world, anyway). So what they do is 3 things.
They create a Review Blog Post for Warrior+ offers on a Wordpress Blog, a review that links to the sales page of course. Then they create a custom audience in FB from their email lists. Then they use 15-second video ads on FB aimed at their custom audience (so, no targeting) which send people to their reviews.

They claim that FB ads aimed at their lists gets much better results than emailing to their lists (but they do both, of course).

They claim that Fb ads aimed to a sales page would be rejected by FB (true). But by sending traffic to a review page, they are OK. Their case studies in OTO1 suggest this is valid.

Oh, and if you don't have a list ... they just choose a W+ offer and create a squeeze page using the same headline and images and design features as the sales letter, for consistency.

I know a lot of folks here knock these guys (especially AF) for rehashed content. But these folks goal is presumably to make money and they appear to be doing a creditable job of doing it.

what F****** value are u talking about, did u make any money or are
u getting paid to support these scammers

(12-29-2018 05:35 AM)mansea1 Wrote: [ -> ]

(12-29-2018 03:54 AM)Johny321 Wrote: [ -> ]art of scamming academy it should be renamed, here is a interesting video exposing scam artist ART!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLTlmC-PsGk

Very informative / entertaining..Repped you for it.

Really you think that idiot is entertaining! Id go with wan*er!