(03-17-2018 01:16 PM)BlackCode Wrote: [ -> ]I'm interested in this course but I'm afraid that I'll pay $1.5K to know how it works and now I have to go and figure out by myself how can I bring traffic to it, which can be the main reason most of who will buy the basic course won't make it work for them and won't even make the $1.5K back, this the first thing I'm worried about.
The second thing and I have two reasons for that, that from the free traffic source videos, I've seen that you are using a bank account in the USA, plus I saw another video that you use smartphones from USA companies for PVA (not sure what's for but I guess for this method because it's new) which makes me think that can work only in the USA, and you wasn't clear if this method requires that you be living in the USA or not unless I missed something.
So please clarify those two points.
Thanks!
You're on a marketing forum so should have some experience in sending traffic. The videos describe what kind of traffic you need, but won't show where to get it nor the exact method I'm using to get the paid traffic for free. I'm from the US, so of course I'm showing a US based bank account. The video about the US phones has nothing to do with this method as it was uploaded to help someone out on a different forum I belong to. So to address your concerns, this method works if you live outside the US.
Okay thanks for your reply.
One more question please, let say that I'll get my own paid traffic for this method, is it going to be positive ROI or it's only profitable with your refund method?
(03-17-2018 01:38 PM)BlackCode Wrote: [ -> ]Okay thanks for your reply.
One more question please, let say that I'll get my own paid traffic for this method, is it going to be positive ROI or it's only profitable with your refund method?
If you're sending the correct traffic and not paying a lot for it, yes, you'll get a positive ROI because of the website and campaign templates I provide. How much ROI depends on how much you pay for traffic of course.
(03-17-2018 03:31 PM)Divine_Joker Wrote: [ -> ]The Word that you are saying is wrong here I think. No one in this World is begger my friend.
The word "begger" is wrong. The correct word is "beggar". That being said, I for one get pretty annoyed when there's post after post of people begging for a free product to do a review. That is why on many forums, such begging is forbidden and will get you banned. I hope the Mods here will consider such a rule. What's worse is when someone doesn't get the free product, then they complain.
All sellers should state upfront what the review policy is and the criteria as to who will be given a review, knowing that potential buyers are going to expect it.
(03-17-2018 03:31 PM)Divine_Joker Wrote: [ -> ] (03-17-2018 01:54 AM)Elliot305 Wrote: [ -> ] (03-17-2018 01:45 AM)Divine_Joker Wrote: [ -> ] (03-17-2018 12:27 AM)Elliot305 Wrote: [ -> ] (03-17-2018 12:15 AM)WillieWinston Wrote: [ -> ]So since a mod can't do the review, now what?
Good question. I'm almost inclined to have you review it since you haven't asked to be a reviewer, but do want it reviewed. At least this way people can see the transparency involved here that I didn't elect someone from behind the scenes. If that's something you want to do, that'll be acceptable to me in lieu of a Mod.
Now this create Doubt in my mind..
People who asked you ignored them completey.. really Confusing..
I didn't want beggers to review my BSO as I explicitly said "no reviews other than a Mod," which is the first reason why I didn't elect you.
Ohk.. Thanks for Your kind word saying me as the begger. I will keep that in my mind. Thank you so much.
I have to say more things about this Your Words. but I am happy to be consider as begger. If You have some great communication skills I think that will help you. By the way best of luck. but mind one thing and take one advice.
Wont You consider someone who asked the review copy second time as begger I think Answer is Yes.
May be You are the Great great Millionaire by Your method. Your Communication with the People lead you bottom from the Top and vice versa. Mind It. You ignore me that's Okay But i think everyone should look at this comment of Your. My intention is not discussion. The Word that you are saying is wrong here I think. No one in this World is begger my friend. Remember that.
Everybody has something special that can be discovered.
Thank You.. for your time to consider me and think of myself. i.e. begger.
You asked to review in post #4, then again in post #9, after I said twice (in the OP and in post #7) that I only would allow a Mod to review.
wow, this sounds super interesting. Is the "get the paid traffic for free" actually illegal or some kind of greyhat, blackhat method? Is it possible that the traffic source will get to know what you are doing and just charge for the whole traffic from the past? Can we use our real bank account or credit card for this or do we need fake cards? And is it possible to just get the traffic method?
(03-20-2018 04:49 AM)igotanedge Wrote: [ -> ]wow, this sounds super interesting. Is the "get the paid traffic for free" actually illegal or some kind of greyhat, blackhat method? Is it possible that the traffic source will get to know what you are doing and just charge for the whole traffic from the past? Can we use our real bank account or credit card for this or do we need fake cards? And is it possible to just get the traffic method?
Hello, great questions. This is NOT illegal at all. It's not even blackhat actually. You're simply using the traffic source's review policies against them. The traffic source wouldn't try to charge the whole amount or any past amounts because they are the ones that have this policy in place actually. You can use your real accounts or cards for the traffic source if you'd like (that's what I do). I'd be open to just doing biz for the free traffic method so if you're interested in that you can add me on Skype to discuss further. It still won't be cheap though since its what I use for the pay-per-call method and am only accepting a small amounts of clients for it.