videopalapp (dot)com

[blitzgeist]

Does anyone know how to remove branding from this application without having to pay an extra $67 for the privilege
videopal. It requires that you pay an extra $67 for agency rights. Something not mentioned in sales pitch

[jarlgre]

Sorry, but that branding comes from their serverside and can't be removed without paying ransom! And you are right about that it wasn't mentioned in their salespage. I am going to comlain about that!

[GetReal]

(02-20-2017 11:10 PM)jarlgre Wrote:  And you are right about that it wasn't mentioned in their salespage.

But it was mentionned on the JV page.

People that are not happy about this front end product may request a refund, there is a 30 days guarantee.

[smartshoppinggg]

there is a major issue in my opinion if you picked up the agency license, when you create an avatar and send the link to your client to get paid, your clients will see the code that reveals the link which redirects them to videopal salespage where they could purchase it for a one time fee instead of paying you monthly or one time fee of a higher price depending on how your agreement is with them. the creator of this software should use anonymous link and not mention videopal in the link to share.

[sup3rman]

What about something like:

Code:

<style>
.videopal-powered {
    display: none !important;
}
</style>

[smartshoppinggg]

again, the branding should not be there in the first place, that's why we purchase the agency license for.

[We Go]

(02-24-2017 12:20 PM)GetReal Wrote:  

(02-20-2017 11:10 PM)jarlgre Wrote:  And you are right about that it wasn't mentioned in their salespage.

But it was mentionned on the JV page.

People that are not happy about this front end product may request a refund, there is a 30 days guarantee.

I bought on the early bird webinar, made a complaint, finally got my refund yesterday.

[smartshoppinggg]

they updated the system and now you can choose generic domains.

[micro]

thats good news with the generic domain ,) finally a step in the right direction.

wish they would have edited the js as well though which is still using videopal_embed.min.js