Search (advanced search) | ||||
Use this Search form before posting, asking or make a new thread.
|
01-13-2016, 01:32 PM
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
Ultramailer and Atomic Mail Sender Limitation. Any Better one?
I try both software above and here is some of my thought.
Ultramailer Pros: able to verify the email before send, not valid email or unable to verify email will not send out Cons: unable to set the number of email for each SMTP server. Example mandrill only accept 600 email per day or 2000/month, the software can simply send more then 2000 on mandrill in one single campaign without able to limit it. Atomic Mail Sender Pros: able to set the number of email for each SMTP server. Cons: Not able to verify the email before send, all email will send out. I believe it will hurt the SMTP server and get banned faster. Any one had better software to introduce with both pros above? |
|||
01-15-2016, 02:10 PM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Ultramailer and Atomic Mail Sender Limitation. Any Better one?
"Pros: able to verify the email before send, not valid email or unable to verify email will not send out"
you do know that for a server to verify an email it pings or most likely send a message to the email and wait for the ping return or any kind of autoreply from the email right? the best thing to do is get 2 server server1 send everything and clean for hardbounces now that your emails have been cleaned use server2 to send out your campaign |
|||
04-05-2016, 03:53 AM
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Ultramailer and Atomic Mail Sender Limitation. Any Better one?
You've said it all @Anniedavis. OP or you use an email verifier service before you send out your emails.
|
|||