{RELAUNCHED} First 10 Buyers will get upto 30% DISCOUNT - AUTHORITY SITE EMPIRE

[qsuccess]

LOTHER PM sent. Good Luck with Your BSO

[jimmythesaint]

please send some examples of sites.. thanks

[lother]

Yes. I am giving out 10 Review copies of 30% discount on Bronze and Silver Package and 20% discount on Gold Package.

Thanks,
Lother

(05-08-2016 09:45 PM)P3ngu1n Wrote:  Any review copy you got?

[lother]

Yes. I am giving out 10 Review copies of 30% discount on Bronze and Silver Package and 20% discount on Gold Package.

Thanks,
Lother
Skype : Authoritysiteempire
E Mail : Authoritysiteempire@gmail.com

(05-08-2016 09:40 PM)pizzz4all Wrote:  looks interesting...any review copy?

[lother]

Yes. I am giving out 10 Review copies of 30% discount on Bronze and Silver Package and 20% discount on Gold Package.

Thanks,
Lother
Skype : Authoritysiteempire
E Mail : Authoritysiteempire@gmail.com

(05-08-2016 09:45 PM)loga2012 Wrote:  Any review copy available

[CallmeReaz]

Have any sample sites to show? Would love to see your previous work (which recently done).
Good luck with the BSO.

[lother]

Hi There,

PM'ed you the Sample Site.



And Pl check OP for the discount on review copies.

Hope to work with you soon.

Regards,
Lother.

(05-08-2016 09:40 PM)pizzz4all Wrote:  looks interesting...any review copy?

[lother]

Hi There,

PM'ed you the samples.

Thanks

(05-08-2016 10:17 PM)CallmeReaz Wrote:  Have any sample sites to show? Would love to see your previous work (which recently done).
Good luck with the BSO.

[SlumdogGeordie]

Just looked at the sample site ( http://epetblog.com ) and here are my comments:

1. Mobile friendly or not: I used Google ( https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/...-friendly/ ) to check this out and the site could not be accessed, so it could not be assessed. However, from past experience, I believe it would not have passed the 'mobile friendly' test, especially regarding some of the font sizes and layout (3 columns are a lot to squeeze into a cell phone's display). But I could be wrong, so you would need to have it confirmed for sure that the site you buy will be readable on mobiles/tablets etc.

2. The content: I was impressed when I saw the first page as I have an interest in dog training, but when I read the articles, I was far from impressed. They are either very badly written, and sometimes misinformed, or they are simply 'spun' articles that have not been proof read. The articles/posts are riddled with errors and any potential buyer of similar sites would have to be prepared to proof read the whole site for errors and content before uploading to the Web..

3. Plagiarism: I didn't spend time checking that as I am fairly certain they are spun and it would have been a waste of time doing so before they were corrected.

Overall the example site 'looks' good (I ignored the header as it is FAR too small) but I would not spend money on such a site unless I was certain it was 'mobile friendly' (60% of Internet users now use their cell phones, etc. to search) and that the spun articles/posts were checked first for grammar/spelling/plagiarism.

Just my penny's worth and I hope it helps in some way.

[lother]

HI Slumdong,

Thanks for your Observation.

1. " Mobile friendly or not: I used Google ( https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/...-friendly/ ) to check this out and the site could not be accessed, so it could not be assessed. However, from past experience, I believe it would not have passed the 'mobile friendly' test, especially regarding some of the font sizes and layout (3 columns are a lot to squeeze into a cell phone's display). But I could be wrong, so you would need to have it confirmed for sure that the site you buy will be readable on mobiles/tablets etc"

Thanks for letting me know. As this site is made to present as a sample site to those who are interested few plugins has been missed to added. Essential plugin like WPtouch Mobile Plugin will be added the site is completed.

2.2. The content: I was impressed when I saw the first page as I have an interest in dog training, but when I read the articles, I was far from impressed. They are either very badly written, and sometimes misinformed, or they are simply 'spun' articles that have not been proof read. The articles/posts are riddled with errors and any potential buyer of similar sites would have to be prepared to proof read the whole site for errors and content before uploading to the Web..

If you are not happy with the articles like if the articles are not well formatted or if you feel it look like spun it will be replaced by a new one. Till you like the same. No compromise on the article quality will be made. I have PM'ed you a new site pl check that site articles quality and report her.

3. Plagiarism: I didn't spend time checking that as I am fairly certain they are spun and it would have been a waste of time doing so before they were corrected.

All the articles were passed 90% above score on Grammerly and all are 100% unique content checked the same on copyspace. If by error any article is not unique the same will be replaced.

I really appreciate your feedback on the sample site. This type of feedback will help our service to improve on the quality.

Thanks,
Lother.

(05-08-2016 10:51 PM)SlumdogGeordie Wrote:  Just looked at the sample site ( http://epetblog.com ) and here are my comments:

1. Mobile friendly or not: I used Google ( https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/...-friendly/ ) to check this out and the site could not be accessed, so it could not be assessed. However, from past experience, I believe it would not have passed the 'mobile friendly' test, especially regarding some of the font sizes and layout (3 columns are a lot to squeeze into a cell phone's display). But I could be wrong, so you would need to have it confirmed for sure that the site you buy will be readable on mobiles/tablets etc.

2. The content: I was impressed when I saw the first page as I have an interest in dog training, but when I read the articles, I was far from impressed. They are either very badly written, and sometimes misinformed, or they are simply 'spun' articles that have not been proof read. The articles/posts are riddled with errors and any potential buyer of similar sites would have to be prepared to proof read the whole site for errors and content before uploading to the Web..

3. Plagiarism: I didn't spend time checking that as I am fairly certain they are spun and it would have been a waste of time doing so before they were corrected.

Overall the example site 'looks' good (I ignored the header as it is FAR too small) but I would not spend money on such a site unless I was certain it was 'mobile friendly' (60% of Internet users now use their cell phones, etc. to search) and that the spun articles/posts were checked first for grammar/spelling/plagiarism.

Just my penny's worth and I hope it helps in some way.