[GET] Video Comet 2014

[saqqa]

3 reps added
thanks

[Eidolon]

Thank you for this share - interesting to note that authors own YT channel has been suspended so take heed.

[bullot]

.................

[Eidolon]

Helpful review Bullot

[Samuel007]

ya ..thanks bullot for the review..and for the OP ..i say..DON_KUMAR.you're the best
REP added for both of you.........thanks a lot

[yarddog2k]

Thanks for the share DON_KUMAR, and thanks to bullot for the great review. Reps for both.

[mybwlmail]

Thank you....Rep Added.

[Big Tuna]

I'm reading this PDF and I'm like:




There are a few problems with this PDF:

1) I know I've read it before, so he obviously repackaged his old one and gave it an updated name
2) None of the videos which he claims are ranked are anywhere to be found in the SERPS
3) Even on the screenshot of the ranked videos, you can see that they were ranked in 2012
4) The "bonus material" (which is actually new from the previous version) was ranked in 2011. And it's nowhere to be found either.

Conclusion:

This guy's a jackass

[Quasar]

(06-23-2014 12:06 PM)Big Tuna Wrote:  I'm reading this PDF and I'm like:




There are a few problems with this PDF:

1) I know I've read it before, so he obviously repackaged his old one and gave it an updated name
2) None of the videos which he claims are ranked are anywhere to be found in the SERPS
3) Even on the screenshot of the ranked videos, you can see that they were ranked in 2012
4) The "bonus material" (which is actually new from the previous version) was ranked in 2011. And it's nowhere to be found either.

Conclusion:

This guy's a jackass

I tried to tell you guys this early in the thread.

The original PDF had dates in 2011 and 2012. I reviewed the new one with the old one side-by-side. All he did was change a couple of sites.

So the info is a minimum of 2 years old. Even if I had not read the original, I would have known two different ways:

1.) The Clickbank screenshots are a dead giveaway.They are at least 2 years old.
2.) The game and CB product he is referencing are o-l-d! Try to find that product on CB now.

When I give something a negative grade of -1 or worse, it isn't subjective bias or because I want to beat the seller up. There are very good reasons for it. That's why I bother to review anything.

I bought this and did get my money back today - after asking for it 3 times.

This guide has ZERO value today, and this seller is worthless.

Is everyone paying attention now?

[1163]

Thanks for sharing +REP added.