[GET] Solo Ad Arbitrage 2.0

[ＮＯＭＯＲＥ]

Nice share max reps :)

[nowimhere]

My thoughts:

This isn't rocket science. I was doing this years before this report actually came out.
Hint hint:

Buy low, SELL HIGH.

So, for example, buy clicks from vendor A for 0.30 cents a click
then sell them for 0.50 cents to 0.60 cents (or whatever) per click
to a buyer.

Advertise as a seller, then when people buy from you, you buy from a
seller and profit the difference.

This can also be done with logo design, web design, copywriting services,
article writing services and all that fun jazz.

Again, its not rocket science. You just have to go out there and do the leg
work in connecting the buyer and seller while taking a profit cut for yourself.
Basically, manage the communication, which isn't that hard :)

[digital5252]

Thx nice share reps added

[tonny]

Thanks. +Reps Added

[Gamelord]

Thanks Mamen

Max rep added

[alfachemy]

Nice share,, Thanks for it

[Gamelord]

Does anyone have the upgrade for this?

The rolodex would be nice :-)

[streetlaw]

Are their any legal risks involved in doing this? I mean who is taking risks here, the person who sends the email or the middle man (you) who provides him the landing page or is it your buyer who actually owns the landing page who is taking a risk?

What I mean by taking a risk is, say for instance the landing page you're passing onto the solo vendor turns out to break the law in some way like their opt in form is non-compliant with spam laws or it's non-compliant with the GDPR law? Who gets in trouble?

[oskaryoel]

Thanks for sharing

[Lumos]

So...the OP is from 3+ years ago, and...:

(03-18-2015 04:40 PM)Mamen Wrote:  Requested here:

Magic Button :

http://bestblackhatforum.com/Thread-REQ-Solo-Ad-Arbitrage-2-0

-->REVIEW<--

I purchased this—for one reason: that I tried v1.0 last year and it worked.
Now the most ridiculous thing is this: There is NO difference between the two versions. This is just a rehash
of the first version. In fact, you are better off with the 1st version since it contains more info than this one. I guess the reason why Jeremy Kennedy didn’t take it to the warrior forum was that he knew everyone would bash it like hell.

WHAT THIS IS ABOUT:

This is about brokering solos from Skype chat rooms as well as Facebook groups. Generally, you look for a supplier with lots of feedback, buy cheap from them, post in the groups and advertise your clicks, and then sell for a profit.

The Pros:
THIS. PLAIN. WORKS. I tested the model last year and I know for a fact that it works. All you need is consistence and patience. You don’t have to have money upfront, or a website, although you need to have a page up where your testimonials are stored. They recommend the Warrior Forum or a free WP site.

The Cons
>One hurdle I faced last year was solo sellers delaying for what felt like centuries before delivering the clicks. Imagine that you have advertised 24hr delivery and your supplier delivers two days later (Oh, forget the feedback, they are still humans). This will have your customers shouting for refunds, plus it destroys your image or
brand.
>Another problem for a beginner is lack of testimonials. This will force you to sacrifice your profit so as to accumulate a few glowing testimonials. But I didn’t let this put me down, so why should you?

FINAL THOUGHT
As I said earlier, this works. If you are interested, get up and dive into this; stop being so dam.n pessimistic like some fellas were last year. Nothing is EASY in this life. You DON’T need v2.0, period. Forget the video, it’s just some gal (supposed to be a solo ad genius, lol) who recorded herself reading the pdf. WHAT A NARROW-MINDED way to produce an IM product!!! Utterly ridiculous. I suggest you concentrate on the pdf and dump both the video and the audio.
Oh, did I say the pdf is full of affiliate links?

Sales Page:

Magic Button :

http://soloadarbitragetwo.com

Direct link:

Magic Button :

https://s3.amazonaws.com/soloadarbitrage...rage+2.zip

SOMEBODY REP for this!

It even says in the OP that the prior version was better - but searching here did not turn that one up...and of course here come a couple of folks to revive such an old thread !!
(Look at the user's stats in replies #18 and 19, that tells exactly what the story is here.)